Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scott Christian" data-source="post: 8168063" data-attributes="member: 6901101">Sorry Chaos, we're just going to have to agree to disagree on this. You want this game to be something else. You consistently argue for it to be something that it is not. The rules of the game are very clear. The play dynamics are very clear. If you want to change them for your table, and have a consensus every time there is a judgement call, go ahead. I hope you film it so I can watch and see how it goes. I would be interested. But doing that 20 times a game seems like a slugfest in my head. (It might not be in real life.) It seems like you are adding parts, and the more parts the greater chance something goes wrong. (It might not be in real life.)So again, round table is cool. I have a game that plays like a round table - but it is not D&D. Because D&D has specific rules.</blockquote>