Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8174310" data-attributes="member: 6779196">Right, but again, the game either merits that label or it doesn’t. We may disagree about the point at which it loses the label, but wherever you think the line lies, the only&nbsp; logically valid conclusion is that you think people who think it lies elsewhere are wrong about that.No, but that’s a preference. If you were saying you prefer D&amp;D with a DM, I would have no objection to that (in fact I would agree with you). But you’re saying you don’t think it’s D&amp;D. The appropriate analogy would be saying you don’t think rocky road is ice cream.Obviously they aren’t doing anything wrong, I don’t think any of us disagree about that. When you say “I wouldn’t personally consider it D&amp;D,” the logical implication is “and therefore I would consider people who call it D&amp;D to be in error.” If you don’t believe they’re in error, then it isn’t logically consistent to say you believe it isn’t D&amp;D.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8174310, member: 6779196"] Right, but again, the game either merits that label or it doesn’t. We may disagree about the point at which it loses the label, but wherever you think the line lies, the only logically valid conclusion is that you think people who think it lies elsewhere are wrong about that. No, but that’s a preference. If you were saying you [I]prefer[/I] D&D with a DM, I would have no objection to that (in fact I would agree with you). But you’re saying you don’t think it’s D&D. The appropriate analogy would be saying you don’t think rocky road is ice cream. Obviously they aren’t doing anything wrong, I don’t think any of us disagree about that. When you say “I wouldn’t personally consider it D&D,” the logical implication is “and therefore I would consider people who call it D&D to be in error.” If you don’t believe they’re in error, then it isn’t logically consistent to say you believe it isn’t D&D. [/QUOTE]

Verification