Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8175096" data-attributes="member: 6801228">I just posted... six times over the last couple posts where I clarified what was going on. The response from Scott Christian, which you have now responded to twice, made it very clear. So, how is it my fault that you responded to posts, and that I responded to you, repeatedly making the point very clear, and that it took that repetition and me using a &quot;cudgel&quot;, oh, sorry, &quot;a lame-ass cudgel&quot; to get you to actually read what I was posting? Because, you want to make this my fault. I stated it, ad nasuem, what the issue being discussed was, and why I took your response the way I did. You wanted to reply and defend yourself by saying &quot;well, it was only my opinion&quot;. You didn't want to address the fact that you responded to the wrong point. You wanted to defend yourself by saying &quot;of course it was a board game, and calling it a board game isn't bad&quot;. You didn't want to address the fact that you responded to the wrong point. Now though, now that I've hammered the point repeatedly. Now you want to address the fact that you responded to the wrong point. Forgive me for not being gracious, but if you understand now, then let us drop it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8175096, member: 6801228"] I just posted... six times over the last couple posts where I clarified what was going on. The response from Scott Christian, which you have now responded to twice, made it very clear. So, how is it my fault that you responded to posts, and that I responded to you, repeatedly making the point very clear, and that it took that repetition and me using a "cudgel", oh, sorry, "a lame-ass cudgel" to get you to actually read what I was posting? Because, you want to make this my fault. I stated it, ad nasuem, what the issue being discussed was, and why I took your response the way I did. You wanted to reply and defend yourself by saying "well, it was only my opinion". You didn't want to address the fact that you responded to the wrong point. You wanted to defend yourself by saying "of course it was a board game, and calling it a board game isn't bad". You didn't want to address the fact that you responded to the wrong point. Now though, now that I've hammered the point repeatedly. Now you want to address the fact that you responded to the wrong point. Forgive me for not being gracious, but if you understand now, then let us drop it. [/QUOTE]

Verification