Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DM Empowerment vs. Player Entitlement - Is this really that prevalent?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 5835207" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Agreed.</p><p></p><p>I don't think this has to be true, although it may depend on what you mean by "DM control".</p><p></p><p>It is possible to run a highly story-focused game in which the GM has a lot of authority over framing the situations/setting up the encounters, but does not have authority over how those situations are resolved - because this is determined by the action resolution mechanics as deployed by the players in playing their PCs.</p><p></p><p>I haven't introduced that many new players to RPGs, but when I have I haven't found what you say to be the case. After all, one thing that can attract new players is the idea of playing a game in which they can write their own fantasy story, with control over the protagonist (their PC). Making good on this promise requires the player, new or otherwise, to be given some significant degree of authority over how the story of the game unfolds.</p><p></p><p>Interesting question. I'm coming to like RPG designs that faciliate player trust independently of GM authority over backstory.</p><p></p><p>One example I have in mind of this sort of mechanic is metagame determined DCs (4e, HeroQuest revised, etc). The players can be confident that, whatever the backstory, the DCs will be roughly achievable. So the way the story unfolds is shaped, in part, by things they don't know, but their PCs can't get mechanically hosed by that backstory.</p><p></p><p>A different sort of example is Burning Wheel, which uses non-metagame setting of DCs (like 3E, it's based entirely on "objective" ingame difficulty) but which has mechanics whereby players can benefit from having their PCs be mechancially hosed (because taking on impossible challenges is central to PC advancement). And the game also has excellent advice on how to GM failed checks (much better than anything I've ever seen in a D&D book).</p><p></p><p>A situation in which the GM has secret backstory knowledge, and there is no sort of mechanical approach to insulate the players and their PCs from being hosed by making the wrong choices in relation to this, can produce an impression of unfairness, I would say. The ToH is probably one well-known example of this, but I think it can apply equally in non-dungeon-crawling, more social/world exploration-oriented games.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 5835207, member: 42582"] Agreed. I don't think this has to be true, although it may depend on what you mean by "DM control". It is possible to run a highly story-focused game in which the GM has a lot of authority over framing the situations/setting up the encounters, but does not have authority over how those situations are resolved - because this is determined by the action resolution mechanics as deployed by the players in playing their PCs. I haven't introduced that many new players to RPGs, but when I have I haven't found what you say to be the case. After all, one thing that can attract new players is the idea of playing a game in which they can write their own fantasy story, with control over the protagonist (their PC). Making good on this promise requires the player, new or otherwise, to be given some significant degree of authority over how the story of the game unfolds. Interesting question. I'm coming to like RPG designs that faciliate player trust independently of GM authority over backstory. One example I have in mind of this sort of mechanic is metagame determined DCs (4e, HeroQuest revised, etc). The players can be confident that, whatever the backstory, the DCs will be roughly achievable. So the way the story unfolds is shaped, in part, by things they don't know, but their PCs can't get mechanically hosed by that backstory. A different sort of example is Burning Wheel, which uses non-metagame setting of DCs (like 3E, it's based entirely on "objective" ingame difficulty) but which has mechanics whereby players can benefit from having their PCs be mechancially hosed (because taking on impossible challenges is central to PC advancement). And the game also has excellent advice on how to GM failed checks (much better than anything I've ever seen in a D&D book). A situation in which the GM has secret backstory knowledge, and there is no sort of mechanical approach to insulate the players and their PCs from being hosed by making the wrong choices in relation to this, can produce an impression of unfairness, I would say. The ToH is probably one well-known example of this, but I think it can apply equally in non-dungeon-crawling, more social/world exploration-oriented games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DM Empowerment vs. Player Entitlement - Is this really that prevalent?
Top