Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fenes 2" data-source="post: 674112" data-attributes="member: 6166">I believe it is called hyperbole, but english is not my first language.Seriously, imho, if you want to play a smart character you should put some points into intelligence, just as you should put points into knowledge skills when you want to play a sage in D&D, and not rely on your own knowledge.If you rely on your own social skills you compensate a stat disadvantage - low int, which translates into low skill points, especially for cross-class skills, with a "roleplaying advantage" - your own glib tongue. Your fighter could concentrate on the "technical" skills while you effectively give him max ranks in bluff, sense motive, diplomacy, intimidate, gather information, knowledge etc. This works especially well if the DM is not exactly the most charismatic person, or a good fast-talker.You were right before - it is not fair.(I should add, however, that I hate puzzle solving in RPGs with a passion.)</blockquote>