Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DM Needs Help with Rules Lawyer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kae'Yoss" data-source="post: 989411" data-attributes="member: 4134"><p><strong>Re: Thanks</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Bad Idea. Be sure to listen to players complaining, for you could really have messed it up. Don't let it turn into a full-scale discussion, for that will slow down play. If you cannot resolve it with a simple look-up in the books, rule-0 it and look into it later. In the next session (at the beginning), say that it was a improvised rule and that you now know the rule in question, and that it is so and so. If he persists in slowing down play, don't hesitate to knock his character out cold, telling him that he may not speak if his character's unconscious.</p><p></p><p>But be sure that you know the rules you are going to use. Look at the stats of the monsters you'll use next game, and make some notes about it. If there are any special rules planned (disarm, sunder, trip, grapple), be sure you know what they do. Also know the spells you are going to use. </p><p></p><p>The most important: Make sure you know what the characters are capable of. Know what spells they have and what they are probably going to use. Make sure that you have read their sheets and noted any special ability and magic item. This should be done before the session (you may even demand they give you a copy of the character sheet).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I really hate this 1337-script, as I hate "phat" spelling (like kool instead of cool or boyz instead of boys) and deaf-mute music (where they not only sing - or rather speak - their lyrics, but seemingly also use sign language)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Although the rogue's focus lies not in battle, he nonetheless depends on sneak attacks. He should be able to deal more damage with it than the fighter does, because the fighter can keep up his high damage potential even against COUPE (constructs, oozes, undead, plants, elementals), and even without feinting or flanking</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Things like that are just plain ugly. That shows that he's a poor example for a DM. The DM should make sure that the rogue gets decent mileage out of sneak attack, but he shouldn't make it available all the time, and for free. Sometimes, he will be able to do it without any difficulty, but somethimes he has to work for it, risk something for it, and sometimes it will be plain impossible. The trick is to challenge all the players from time to time, and none all the time.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Remember: Rough rogues don't use rouge. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nonetheless, Sneak Attack is the rogues primary weapon in combat. Especially in combat-heavy campaigns, all the party members should be useful. So take SA away sometimes, but not all the time.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A little to biased IMO, but alright. IMC, Some enemies will attack the enemy that deals the highest damage, others try to disable the first enemy as fast as possible: rather than attacking the fighter so that he'll fall sooner, they try to drop the rogue or at least make him retreat. Other enemies will just attack the character who stands nearest. It's all a matter of the enemy's tactical skill and intelligence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kae'Yoss, post: 989411, member: 4134"] [b]Re: Thanks[/b] Bad Idea. Be sure to listen to players complaining, for you could really have messed it up. Don't let it turn into a full-scale discussion, for that will slow down play. If you cannot resolve it with a simple look-up in the books, rule-0 it and look into it later. In the next session (at the beginning), say that it was a improvised rule and that you now know the rule in question, and that it is so and so. If he persists in slowing down play, don't hesitate to knock his character out cold, telling him that he may not speak if his character's unconscious. But be sure that you know the rules you are going to use. Look at the stats of the monsters you'll use next game, and make some notes about it. If there are any special rules planned (disarm, sunder, trip, grapple), be sure you know what they do. Also know the spells you are going to use. The most important: Make sure you know what the characters are capable of. Know what spells they have and what they are probably going to use. Make sure that you have read their sheets and noted any special ability and magic item. This should be done before the session (you may even demand they give you a copy of the character sheet). I really hate this 1337-script, as I hate "phat" spelling (like kool instead of cool or boyz instead of boys) and deaf-mute music (where they not only sing - or rather speak - their lyrics, but seemingly also use sign language) Although the rogue's focus lies not in battle, he nonetheless depends on sneak attacks. He should be able to deal more damage with it than the fighter does, because the fighter can keep up his high damage potential even against COUPE (constructs, oozes, undead, plants, elementals), and even without feinting or flanking [B][/B] Things like that are just plain ugly. That shows that he's a poor example for a DM. The DM should make sure that the rogue gets decent mileage out of sneak attack, but he shouldn't make it available all the time, and for free. Sometimes, he will be able to do it without any difficulty, but somethimes he has to work for it, risk something for it, and sometimes it will be plain impossible. The trick is to challenge all the players from time to time, and none all the time. Remember: Rough rogues don't use rouge. :D I agree. [B][/B] Nonetheless, Sneak Attack is the rogues primary weapon in combat. Especially in combat-heavy campaigns, all the party members should be useful. So take SA away sometimes, but not all the time. A little to biased IMO, but alright. IMC, Some enemies will attack the enemy that deals the highest damage, others try to disable the first enemy as fast as possible: rather than attacking the fighter so that he'll fall sooner, they try to drop the rogue or at least make him retreat. Other enemies will just attack the character who stands nearest. It's all a matter of the enemy's tactical skill and intelligence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DM Needs Help with Rules Lawyer
Top