Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DM Question: Mind Blank
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doktorstick" data-source="post: 264583" data-attributes="member: 4485"><p>I presently have no opinion on this. On one hand, it is an 8th-level spell and the wording seems fairly straightforward. On the other hand, it doesn't seem immediately obvious that <em>true strike</em> and <em>see invisibility</em> would be stopped by <em>mind blank</em>.</p><p></p><p>On <em>true strike</em>: The character that will be the victim of the spell has, in his mind, either by instinct or plan, what he is about to do in the next instance or three. This spell, discerns that information and bestows upon the user this knowledge. Using this knowledge, the user has intimate knowledge on where to strike his foe.</p><p></p><p>On <em>see invisibility</em>: The character that is invisible has intimate knowledge of his self. Otherwise, he would be bumbling about and unable to perform (as if blinded). Since he knows his location relative to his surroundings, it is information that can be learned by others. This spell uses that knowledge to give the user that information as well so they can see the person.</p><p></p><p>Counter to <em>see invisibility</em>: An invisible object does not have knowledge of its location, nor itself. It couldn't give up its location in such fashion. However, this spell still works on invisible objects.</p><p></p><p>These rationalizations do not help the problem, but are my weak attempt at providing information to this discussion. I personally like the idea that <em>mind blank</em> stops a wide variety of spells. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>/ds</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doktorstick, post: 264583, member: 4485"] I presently have no opinion on this. On one hand, it is an 8th-level spell and the wording seems fairly straightforward. On the other hand, it doesn't seem immediately obvious that [I]true strike[/I] and [I]see invisibility[/I] would be stopped by [I]mind blank[/I]. On [I]true strike[/I]: The character that will be the victim of the spell has, in his mind, either by instinct or plan, what he is about to do in the next instance or three. This spell, discerns that information and bestows upon the user this knowledge. Using this knowledge, the user has intimate knowledge on where to strike his foe. On [i]see invisibility[/i]: The character that is invisible has intimate knowledge of his self. Otherwise, he would be bumbling about and unable to perform (as if blinded). Since he knows his location relative to his surroundings, it is information that can be learned by others. This spell uses that knowledge to give the user that information as well so they can see the person. Counter to [i]see invisibility[/i]: An invisible object does not have knowledge of its location, nor itself. It couldn't give up its location in such fashion. However, this spell still works on invisible objects. These rationalizations do not help the problem, but are my weak attempt at providing information to this discussion. I personally like the idea that [i]mind blank[/i] stops a wide variety of spells. :) /ds [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DM Question: Mind Blank
Top