Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
DM versus Players
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 4972744" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>This presumes that one only tangles with a rust monster in order to get the bling behind the rust monster. Either that or they are "forced" to do so.</p><p></p><p>That doesn't resemble the game experience I seek.</p><p>Sure, getting new and better gear is an element of the fun.</p><p>But so is overcoming things when under various disadvantages, such as fearing losing gear or having lost gear.</p><p></p><p>But even more important is the character's involvement in larger than life adventure.</p><p>As you express the point of "screw those children", I really see us talking about very different ideas of what makes the fun be fun. For all I know, you are having vastly more fun than me. But it is certainly different.</p><p></p><p>You don't have to be "save the children" characters to have fun playing. That implies good guy "hero" characters only. But, to me, there must be something the characters care about or have some drive to go after. And you seem to be using "save the children" as a simple placeholder for whatever accomplishment the party is after.</p><p></p><p></p><p>A separate angle on your response is: why must every monster be something you defeat? Monsters that can only be *defeated* by "nuke for orbit" can be GREAT creatures to use. I disagree with the implication that this constitutes the only sensible response. To paraphrase a friend from around here: If the DM puts a river of acid in front of the party it does not mean that the party is expected to drink it away. And if a player concludes that this is the only sensible option, then there is a real problem in mismatch between DM and player.</p><p></p><p>A *BAD DM* can screw up a game in all kinds of ways. But I'm assuming a good DM. With a good DM, you can decimate the party's supplies and resources and then throw a seemingly (or even truly) overwhelming challenge in the party's path and still create a really fun experience. But I'm also assuming the party won't try to drink the acid and won't expect every encounter to provide a material profit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 4972744, member: 957"] This presumes that one only tangles with a rust monster in order to get the bling behind the rust monster. Either that or they are "forced" to do so. That doesn't resemble the game experience I seek. Sure, getting new and better gear is an element of the fun. But so is overcoming things when under various disadvantages, such as fearing losing gear or having lost gear. But even more important is the character's involvement in larger than life adventure. As you express the point of "screw those children", I really see us talking about very different ideas of what makes the fun be fun. For all I know, you are having vastly more fun than me. But it is certainly different. You don't have to be "save the children" characters to have fun playing. That implies good guy "hero" characters only. But, to me, there must be something the characters care about or have some drive to go after. And you seem to be using "save the children" as a simple placeholder for whatever accomplishment the party is after. A separate angle on your response is: why must every monster be something you defeat? Monsters that can only be *defeated* by "nuke for orbit" can be GREAT creatures to use. I disagree with the implication that this constitutes the only sensible response. To paraphrase a friend from around here: If the DM puts a river of acid in front of the party it does not mean that the party is expected to drink it away. And if a player concludes that this is the only sensible option, then there is a real problem in mismatch between DM and player. A *BAD DM* can screw up a game in all kinds of ways. But I'm assuming a good DM. With a good DM, you can decimate the party's supplies and resources and then throw a seemingly (or even truly) overwhelming challenge in the party's path and still create a really fun experience. But I'm also assuming the party won't try to drink the acid and won't expect every encounter to provide a material profit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
DM versus Players
Top