Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMG - breaking bounded accuracy already?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paraxis" data-source="post: 6496408" data-attributes="member: 13009"><p>Your opinion isn't true just because you say so either. So your point is?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Is saying "myself and others" repeatedly supposed to add some form of credibility to your opinion? It doesn't you can't prove you are in the majority any more than I can, so why don't you just speak for yourself.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Using words like "utter crap" doesn't help your credibility or convince people your point of view is valid.</p><p></p><p>In fact they didn't care about the math, if you were there through the entire playtest process and watched all the videos you would know they saved the "math" parts till last, as they wanted to get the "feel" of the game right first, a huge mistake and backwards thinking in my opinion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am griping about something so yeah good for you for catching on to that, here is a cookie. There is a problem, bounded accuracy doesn't exist when it was something the game was supposed to be built around, it is a good idea they just failed to implement it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I was using an extreme example sure but the game should work at the extremes, that is kind of the point of bounded accuracy. </p><p></p><p>So sure here are other ways bounded accuracy is broken.</p><p></p><p>Any AC higher than 24, if you look at the monsters this is the cap, if you look at the monsters you will notice many of the lowest level monsters have a +5 or so to hit. One of the stated, if not the key stated goal of bounded accuracy was that monsters of all challenge rating could be used at all levels and would not need a natural 20 to hit. So yes a 31 or 32 AC as the extreme example drives the point home, the problem is bounded accuracy breaks after AC 24.</p><p></p><p>Ability scores were supposed to be capped, so that the game fell within bounds and did not break, with magic items like belts of giant strength and the tomes of ability enhancement these bounds are meaningless. Again the DMG breaks bounded accuracy, the point of the thread.</p><p></p><p>All the points of view against my issues seem to fall under two categories.</p><p>First, the DM is in charge and can control this issue, he can fix it, it is always a bad sign when that is the solution. The game is supposed to work without the DM needing to fix things. Thats why we pay money to companies with game designers to make a good quality game.</p><p></p><p>Second, following rules as written random treasure charts the magic items and combinations of them will never show up in a game. This is an issue because it is never called out to new DM's that these issues can happen, you and I know the game gets broke when you hand out powerful magic items so we don't do it, but shouldn't that advice be in the DMG? Shouldn't the game just not allow for it in the first place?</p><p></p><p>In my games, I don't hand out magic items with bonuses of +2 or higher, I will never give out any of the tomes, I will never use belts of giant strength as written. I know how to "fix" the game for my table, I am just saying I shouldn't have to, I wouldn't have to if the game wasn't broken to begin with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paraxis, post: 6496408, member: 13009"] Your opinion isn't true just because you say so either. So your point is? Is saying "myself and others" repeatedly supposed to add some form of credibility to your opinion? It doesn't you can't prove you are in the majority any more than I can, so why don't you just speak for yourself. Using words like "utter crap" doesn't help your credibility or convince people your point of view is valid. In fact they didn't care about the math, if you were there through the entire playtest process and watched all the videos you would know they saved the "math" parts till last, as they wanted to get the "feel" of the game right first, a huge mistake and backwards thinking in my opinion. I am griping about something so yeah good for you for catching on to that, here is a cookie. There is a problem, bounded accuracy doesn't exist when it was something the game was supposed to be built around, it is a good idea they just failed to implement it. I was using an extreme example sure but the game should work at the extremes, that is kind of the point of bounded accuracy. So sure here are other ways bounded accuracy is broken. Any AC higher than 24, if you look at the monsters this is the cap, if you look at the monsters you will notice many of the lowest level monsters have a +5 or so to hit. One of the stated, if not the key stated goal of bounded accuracy was that monsters of all challenge rating could be used at all levels and would not need a natural 20 to hit. So yes a 31 or 32 AC as the extreme example drives the point home, the problem is bounded accuracy breaks after AC 24. Ability scores were supposed to be capped, so that the game fell within bounds and did not break, with magic items like belts of giant strength and the tomes of ability enhancement these bounds are meaningless. Again the DMG breaks bounded accuracy, the point of the thread. All the points of view against my issues seem to fall under two categories. First, the DM is in charge and can control this issue, he can fix it, it is always a bad sign when that is the solution. The game is supposed to work without the DM needing to fix things. Thats why we pay money to companies with game designers to make a good quality game. Second, following rules as written random treasure charts the magic items and combinations of them will never show up in a game. This is an issue because it is never called out to new DM's that these issues can happen, you and I know the game gets broke when you hand out powerful magic items so we don't do it, but shouldn't that advice be in the DMG? Shouldn't the game just not allow for it in the first place? In my games, I don't hand out magic items with bonuses of +2 or higher, I will never give out any of the tomes, I will never use belts of giant strength as written. I know how to "fix" the game for my table, I am just saying I shouldn't have to, I wouldn't have to if the game wasn't broken to begin with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMG - breaking bounded accuracy already?
Top