Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMG Excerpt: Creating a New Race
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6433034" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>I believe they retconned the origin of elves in Eberron, but that was mostly additive, which was much easier. Ditto Dark Sun. </p><p>It might have been a response to the awkward retconning of the Realms. Or not. (I'm rather happy we didn't get Dragonlance after all, as they likely would have suggested the Silvanesti were from the feywild too.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>The subrace problem was mostly a greyhawk one as the difference between high vs. grey vs. wood was subtle. And Dragonlance did the same by renaming but making them all unpronounceable (silvanesti, qualinesti, and kagonesti). I thought forgotten realms with its sun/gold elves, moon/silver elves, and copper elves was a little more memorable.</p><p></p><p>The reasoning made sense. High, grey, wood equals Eldrond, Galadriel, and Legolas. But it is one too many. I'm happy with the 5e overlapping of high and grey.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's certainly emblematic of 4e's attitude to the game's history. But I think you can like/hate eladrin on their own merits. Or, such as me, like the concept but hate the reasoning.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I felt a little insulted. There were too many subraces but the solution is to reduce and streamline, not dump the whole idea. </p><p>"People are confused by our 52 flavours of iced cream. Let's just serve vanilla. And chocolate frozen yoghourt for cocoa fans.</p><p></p><p>It was a lot like the metallic dragons. </p><p>"People find brass, bronze, and copper confusing and interchangeable." </p><p>"Well, we could emphasise their differences and think of mnemonic ways of making them distinct."</p><p>"Naw, let's just replace them with mithril and adamantine." </p><p></p><p>That's insulting and annoying regardless of the edition the change is being done for.</p><p></p><p>5e gets it just right. There are three major tropes of elf in D&D so there are three types of elf: high, wood, and drow. Those don't need to be different races, but neither do we need grey and wild. </p><p>But, really, you need not even go that far. Essentials showed eladrin were kinda superflous when it gave elves the stats of +2 Dex, +2 Wis/Int, as they could easily be a wizard or a ranger with no confusion and the racial power worked for both. Eladrin pretty much existed because the designers couldn't give elves a choice in ability scores but wanted the race to be equally perfect for wizard and ranger.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6433034, member: 37579"] I believe they retconned the origin of elves in Eberron, but that was mostly additive, which was much easier. Ditto Dark Sun. It might have been a response to the awkward retconning of the Realms. Or not. (I'm rather happy we didn't get Dragonlance after all, as they likely would have suggested the Silvanesti were from the feywild too.) The subrace problem was mostly a greyhawk one as the difference between high vs. grey vs. wood was subtle. And Dragonlance did the same by renaming but making them all unpronounceable (silvanesti, qualinesti, and kagonesti). I thought forgotten realms with its sun/gold elves, moon/silver elves, and copper elves was a little more memorable. The reasoning made sense. High, grey, wood equals Eldrond, Galadriel, and Legolas. But it is one too many. I'm happy with the 5e overlapping of high and grey. It's certainly emblematic of 4e's attitude to the game's history. But I think you can like/hate eladrin on their own merits. Or, such as me, like the concept but hate the reasoning. I felt a little insulted. There were too many subraces but the solution is to reduce and streamline, not dump the whole idea. "People are confused by our 52 flavours of iced cream. Let's just serve vanilla. And chocolate frozen yoghourt for cocoa fans. It was a lot like the metallic dragons. "People find brass, bronze, and copper confusing and interchangeable." "Well, we could emphasise their differences and think of mnemonic ways of making them distinct." "Naw, let's just replace them with mithril and adamantine." That's insulting and annoying regardless of the edition the change is being done for. 5e gets it just right. There are three major tropes of elf in D&D so there are three types of elf: high, wood, and drow. Those don't need to be different races, but neither do we need grey and wild. But, really, you need not even go that far. Essentials showed eladrin were kinda superflous when it gave elves the stats of +2 Dex, +2 Wis/Int, as they could easily be a wizard or a ranger with no confusion and the racial power worked for both. Eladrin pretty much existed because the designers couldn't give elves a choice in ability scores but wanted the race to be equally perfect for wizard and ranger. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMG Excerpt: Creating a New Race
Top