Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pascale" data-source="post: 4916749" data-attributes="member: 84899">It is still good idea, and one that likely predates Mearls by a lot.&nbsp; I can't I'm surprised that WotC is recyling this as they have doing that since they began as a company. &nbsp;I am however, a little confused.&nbsp; I though situations like were what page 42 in the DMG 1 were for?&nbsp; Or is in the DMG 2 becuase WotC that DM aren't creative enough on their own to think that being able to drop a chandelier or whatever would cool?&nbsp; Maybe they just don't know what else to put in it and a looking to fill pages?&nbsp; I also the beauty of pg 42 was that it could be applied to well, anything.&nbsp; Guess they specific, becuase general doesn't sell as many books.&nbsp;I find the implementation to be kinda, well 4e.&nbsp; Why would a chandelier become harder to take down for a higher level party then a lower level party?&nbsp; Or is level referring to the level of the chandeleer, and in that case how does on determine the level of a chandelier?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pascale, post: 4916749, member: 84899"] It is still good idea, and one that likely predates Mearls by a lot. I can't I'm surprised that WotC is recyling this as they have doing that since they began as a company. I am however, a little confused. I though situations like were what page 42 in the DMG 1 were for? Or is in the DMG 2 becuase WotC that DM aren't creative enough on their own to think that being able to drop a chandelier or whatever would cool? Maybe they just don't know what else to put in it and a looking to fill pages? I also the beauty of pg 42 was that it could be applied to well, anything. Guess they specific, becuase general doesn't sell as many books. I find the implementation to be kinda, well 4e. Why would a chandelier become harder to take down for a higher level party then a lower level party? Or is level referring to the level of the chandeleer, and in that case how does on determine the level of a chandelier? [/QUOTE]

Verification