Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMG page 274.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tormyr" data-source="post: 6459930" data-attributes="member: 6776887"><p>Even with the low damage, high hp creature, fights don't drag. 3 or fewer rounds on average is a pretty quick fight.</p><p></p><p>While its true that the stat block when viewed on its own is very static, the actual guidelines that accompany it provide a wide array of directions a DM can go. They don't focus on a 4e design approach in my opinion because they allow you to create the "average" creature or something that does more damage. You need that big HP jump between CR levels because that and DPR are the currency you spend to add traits and other special stuff. If the DM does not modify the HP or DPR as other powerful abilities are added, the creature ceases to be a CR1 creature.</p><p></p><p>The HP of creatures in the MM are lower than the stat block in the DMG because the creatures are modified in other areas as well. If the DMG tables had CR 1/8 at 7-14, CR 1/4 15-30, CR 1/2 31-45 then the base AC, DPR, and AB would have to be higher, and not all creatures in the MM are built that way. The other thing is that the stat table is listing <u>effective</u> HP, AC, DPR, and AB. Traits and other special abilities modify these in a way that will not be displayed in a creatures stat block in the MM.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps even more compelling of an argument is that having the high HP in the table allows for the AC, DPR, and AB to scale from low numbers at CR < 1 to high numbers at CR 30. A CR 1/8 creature with 7-14 hp falls within the existing guidelines, although it is a bit on the low side. A CR 1/4 creature with 15-30 hp would need an AC of 15, a DPR of 7, or an AB of 5 to balance out the lower HP. If the lower HP is codified, then at least 1 of those changes would need to be codified as well. The DPR would be the best candidate from a standpoint of keeping the AC and AB scaling from low to high, but it makes the creatures more swingy by default. The higher DPR and lower hp would continue all the way up to CR 30 to provide a constant progression. This could be done, but as I mentioned before, it might make the creatures even more swingy if that is the default that everything is built off of.</p><p></p><p>It seems that HP more than anything else is the currency used to purchase, higher AC, AB, DPR, traits or other special abilities. The end result is that the HP in published monsters is lower than the effective HP listed in the CR table in the DMG.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tormyr, post: 6459930, member: 6776887"] Even with the low damage, high hp creature, fights don't drag. 3 or fewer rounds on average is a pretty quick fight. While its true that the stat block when viewed on its own is very static, the actual guidelines that accompany it provide a wide array of directions a DM can go. They don't focus on a 4e design approach in my opinion because they allow you to create the "average" creature or something that does more damage. You need that big HP jump between CR levels because that and DPR are the currency you spend to add traits and other special stuff. If the DM does not modify the HP or DPR as other powerful abilities are added, the creature ceases to be a CR1 creature. The HP of creatures in the MM are lower than the stat block in the DMG because the creatures are modified in other areas as well. If the DMG tables had CR 1/8 at 7-14, CR 1/4 15-30, CR 1/2 31-45 then the base AC, DPR, and AB would have to be higher, and not all creatures in the MM are built that way. The other thing is that the stat table is listing [U]effective[/U] HP, AC, DPR, and AB. Traits and other special abilities modify these in a way that will not be displayed in a creatures stat block in the MM. Perhaps even more compelling of an argument is that having the high HP in the table allows for the AC, DPR, and AB to scale from low numbers at CR < 1 to high numbers at CR 30. A CR 1/8 creature with 7-14 hp falls within the existing guidelines, although it is a bit on the low side. A CR 1/4 creature with 15-30 hp would need an AC of 15, a DPR of 7, or an AB of 5 to balance out the lower HP. If the lower HP is codified, then at least 1 of those changes would need to be codified as well. The DPR would be the best candidate from a standpoint of keeping the AC and AB scaling from low to high, but it makes the creatures more swingy by default. The higher DPR and lower hp would continue all the way up to CR 30 to provide a constant progression. This could be done, but as I mentioned before, it might make the creatures even more swingy if that is the default that everything is built off of. It seems that HP more than anything else is the currency used to purchase, higher AC, AB, DPR, traits or other special abilities. The end result is that the HP in published monsters is lower than the effective HP listed in the CR table in the DMG. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMG page 274.
Top