Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DMG to include a "starter town".
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 3835462" data-attributes="member: 1288"><p>No, not really. I think calling the difference between "less complex" and "not at all complex" has a much deeper connotation than a simple difference in degree. But I don't think rehashing that any further is going to accomplish anything.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since you were responding to something that I didn't say, yes, I have to acknowledge that you probably didn't mean what I thought you did.</p><p></p><p>That doesn't change the fact that it was rudely dismissive. If you want to keep discussing this--and I assume the fact that we're still going back and forth means that you do--I'll ask you not to assign or assume bias, regardless of how strongly you disagree with my interpretations. (Particularly since, in this case, you were assuming bias based on a misunderstanding of what I said.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, for the nonce (though I think that's really only one of the topics at hand).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't believe for one moment that 4E's level of simplicity is going to drive off a huge fraction of the fanbase. I think it'll drive off a <em>few</em> people, just as the "simplification" of 3E drove off a few people. (I still remember people who honestly complained about the dumbing down of the game that came with the loss of THAC0. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> )</p><p></p><p>Sure, I could be wrong. So could WotC. That's always a gamble with a major change, such as a new edition. But I don't think so, especially since--as I've said--we've seen these same arguments before, and since the arguments we're seeing now are based on a tiny trickle of context-less and woefully incomplete information.</p><p></p><p>Something else to consider... So far, this discussion has revolved around the notion that "4E is being simplified" as though that were stated fact. It's not, at least not to the extent that some people are talking about.</p><p></p><p>Yes, it's simplified in as much as it's (purportedly) easier to play, faster to run, requires less prep. But on the flip side of the coin, every character now has a plethora of tactical options formerly reserved only for the full-advancement casters, and even they now have a variety of <em>types</em> of powers to choose from.</p><p></p><p>So even if the game is <em>mechanically</em> simpler, it doesn't necessarily follow that it'll be <em>tactically</em> simpler, nor does it necessarily follow that PC creation will lack as full a range of options as 3E did at the same point in its lifecycle.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 3835462, member: 1288"] No, not really. I think calling the difference between "less complex" and "not at all complex" has a much deeper connotation than a simple difference in degree. But I don't think rehashing that any further is going to accomplish anything. Since you were responding to something that I didn't say, yes, I have to acknowledge that you probably didn't mean what I thought you did. That doesn't change the fact that it was rudely dismissive. If you want to keep discussing this--and I assume the fact that we're still going back and forth means that you do--I'll ask you not to assign or assume bias, regardless of how strongly you disagree with my interpretations. (Particularly since, in this case, you were assuming bias based on a misunderstanding of what I said.) Okay, for the nonce (though I think that's really only one of the topics at hand). I don't believe for one moment that 4E's level of simplicity is going to drive off a huge fraction of the fanbase. I think it'll drive off a [i]few[/i] people, just as the "simplification" of 3E drove off a few people. (I still remember people who honestly complained about the dumbing down of the game that came with the loss of THAC0. :confused: ) Sure, I could be wrong. So could WotC. That's always a gamble with a major change, such as a new edition. But I don't think so, especially since--as I've said--we've seen these same arguments before, and since the arguments we're seeing now are based on a tiny trickle of context-less and woefully incomplete information. Something else to consider... So far, this discussion has revolved around the notion that "4E is being simplified" as though that were stated fact. It's not, at least not to the extent that some people are talking about. Yes, it's simplified in as much as it's (purportedly) easier to play, faster to run, requires less prep. But on the flip side of the coin, every character now has a plethora of tactical options formerly reserved only for the full-advancement casters, and even they now have a variety of [i]types[/i] of powers to choose from. So even if the game is [i]mechanically[/i] simpler, it doesn't necessarily follow that it'll be [i]tactically[/i] simpler, nor does it necessarily follow that PC creation will lack as full a range of options as 3E did at the same point in its lifecycle. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DMG to include a "starter town".
Top