Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
DMing: How do I setup philosophical in-character discussions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darth Shoju" data-source="post: 3002029" data-attributes="member: 11397"><p>Looks like you allready have some good ideas going there. Here's a couple of situations that came up in my campaign that produced debate (which happened often):</p><p></p><p>1) The leader of a criminal organization that had cels throughout two kingdoms wanted the party to do something for him. He threatened to have his cels randomly kill innocents every day the party didn't do what he asked. One PC refused and started to walk away, which prompted the party wizard to imprison him in a wall of force and then agree to the terms (she said she was afraid he would be killed if he walked away). </p><p></p><p>2) The party was captured by a bounty hunter that was about 4 levels lower than them. On the way to delivering them to his employer they escaped and captured him. He promised to take them to his employer if they spared his life. The party wizard agreed, while the party rogue (a member of a minor noble house) swore openly he would kill the bounty hunter at the first opportunity. For some reason no-one in the party believed he would do it. When they met up with the bounty hunter's employer and were in the middle of combating him (the bounty hunter was assisting the party), the rogue attacked said bounty hunter and killed him. Some of the party felt guilty about this, as they had sworn to protect the bounty hunter. The rogue repented to appease the party but was not sincere.</p><p></p><p>Overall I found it fairly easy to get these discussions going, but I think that had a lot to do with the players. I didn't have a problem with it when it related to the plot and it's advancement, or the character's advancement, but occasionally they would engage in philosophical debate that wasn't really related to the plot (but was tangentally related to the game world). These debates would last over an hour and involve 2-3 players. I and the other players would just watch while this happened and ulitmately get bored and restless. I usually had to draw them to a conclusion of some sort so we could keep playing. I guess all I am saying is just make sure that eveyone is having fun.</p><p></p><p> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darth Shoju, post: 3002029, member: 11397"] Looks like you allready have some good ideas going there. Here's a couple of situations that came up in my campaign that produced debate (which happened often): 1) The leader of a criminal organization that had cels throughout two kingdoms wanted the party to do something for him. He threatened to have his cels randomly kill innocents every day the party didn't do what he asked. One PC refused and started to walk away, which prompted the party wizard to imprison him in a wall of force and then agree to the terms (she said she was afraid he would be killed if he walked away). 2) The party was captured by a bounty hunter that was about 4 levels lower than them. On the way to delivering them to his employer they escaped and captured him. He promised to take them to his employer if they spared his life. The party wizard agreed, while the party rogue (a member of a minor noble house) swore openly he would kill the bounty hunter at the first opportunity. For some reason no-one in the party believed he would do it. When they met up with the bounty hunter's employer and were in the middle of combating him (the bounty hunter was assisting the party), the rogue attacked said bounty hunter and killed him. Some of the party felt guilty about this, as they had sworn to protect the bounty hunter. The rogue repented to appease the party but was not sincere. Overall I found it fairly easy to get these discussions going, but I think that had a lot to do with the players. I didn't have a problem with it when it related to the plot and it's advancement, or the character's advancement, but occasionally they would engage in philosophical debate that wasn't really related to the plot (but was tangentally related to the game world). These debates would last over an hour and involve 2-3 players. I and the other players would just watch while this happened and ulitmately get bored and restless. I usually had to draw them to a conclusion of some sort so we could keep playing. I guess all I am saying is just make sure that eveyone is having fun. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
DMing: How do I setup philosophical in-character discussions?
Top