Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DM's and Rules Lawyers - How Would You Rule this Deadly Situation?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DM-Rocco" data-source="post: 2538725" data-attributes="member: 14451"><p>Don't get me wrong, I think my DM is nuts. I know that a shield has an armor check penalty that takes the bulk of a shield into account. I even suggested that a player could push into his enemy with the shield to knock the opponent out of the way, thus reducing the bulk of the shield because you are using it as a tool to help assassit you in your tumble, but he is nuts.</p><p></p><p>Yeah, I called you nuts <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> </p><p></p><p>He likes to search my threads, so I know he is reading <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p>Anyway, I strongly disagree with my DM on this point, and others, but we debate things out and I have a few victories under my belt, but ultimately he is the DM, if he want to imposed a rule that said you can't tumble through an enemy occupied square with a shield, then I can either not play or play by his rules.</p><p></p><p>I DM regular D&D, I play in his Grim and Gritty game, (G&G), and it is a more brutail and harsher world with closer ties to realism in combat and such things. I lose this round of fighting by conceeding the shield thing, but I may win the sneak attack rules. Recently he has tried to change the sneak attack rules to something weaker. As a 1 level fighter and a 7th level rogue who has invested 1 and a half years of play into his game, 7 rogue levels, the improved feint feat to make use of sneak attack and lots of skill ranks in tumble and bluff, if he makes sneak attack weaker, I will opt to not play any longer because he has gone too far.</p><p></p><p>Okay, now I'm ranting and raving. Anyway, you might not agree with the DM, but you should either respect his ruling or not play his game. You can debate it, but if it is carved in stone, the DM has the final word.</p><p></p><p>But I'll give you his e-mail address if you want to writew him and tell him he is a nut. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DM-Rocco, post: 2538725, member: 14451"] Don't get me wrong, I think my DM is nuts. I know that a shield has an armor check penalty that takes the bulk of a shield into account. I even suggested that a player could push into his enemy with the shield to knock the opponent out of the way, thus reducing the bulk of the shield because you are using it as a tool to help assassit you in your tumble, but he is nuts. Yeah, I called you nuts :p He likes to search my threads, so I know he is reading ;) Anyway, I strongly disagree with my DM on this point, and others, but we debate things out and I have a few victories under my belt, but ultimately he is the DM, if he want to imposed a rule that said you can't tumble through an enemy occupied square with a shield, then I can either not play or play by his rules. I DM regular D&D, I play in his Grim and Gritty game, (G&G), and it is a more brutail and harsher world with closer ties to realism in combat and such things. I lose this round of fighting by conceeding the shield thing, but I may win the sneak attack rules. Recently he has tried to change the sneak attack rules to something weaker. As a 1 level fighter and a 7th level rogue who has invested 1 and a half years of play into his game, 7 rogue levels, the improved feint feat to make use of sneak attack and lots of skill ranks in tumble and bluff, if he makes sneak attack weaker, I will opt to not play any longer because he has gone too far. Okay, now I'm ranting and raving. Anyway, you might not agree with the DM, but you should either respect his ruling or not play his game. You can debate it, but if it is carved in stone, the DM has the final word. But I'll give you his e-mail address if you want to writew him and tell him he is a nut. :cool: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
DM's and Rules Lawyers - How Would You Rule this Deadly Situation?
Top