Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
DMs: Are you a "plot-nazi"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 272351" data-attributes="member: 1288"><p>It's important to remember that including a story does <em>not</em> always equate to being a plot-nazi or to railroading.</p><p></p><p>My campaigns usually have overriding plot arcs. That's not to say that every game is involved in that plot, but the plot is always there in the background, and is always advanced every few games. (For an example, look at a TV series like Babylon 5.)</p><p></p><p><em>But...</em></p><p></p><p>I do <em>not</em> remove the players' free will. If they follow the plot hooks, great. If not, well, they may not be in a position to stop something nasty from happening, but they'll get to do other stuff instead.</p><p></p><p>Or, even more frequently, I have basic plot points imagined, but I work them in when and how it best suits what the players are doing. Avoided that really cool story idea I had because they went to one kingdom instead of the other? No problem. I'll either save it, and use it later, or I'll rework it so I can run it where they are now.</p><p></p><p>So yes, I've got a story, and some of it's even planned out, but I mold it, reshape it, and change it as needed to fit the players' actions, not the other way around.</p><p></p><p>None of that, as I see it, is railroading. Refusing to let the PCs make a difference, changing the rules because they "must" be captured for the plot to advance, refusing to let really well-planned tactics work just because they might kill an "important" NPC--<em>that</em> is evil.</p><p></p><p>Having the basic elements and major plot points of a story planned ahead of time is fine, if you're able to change it on the fly and let the players decide how/when/if elements of it creep into the campaign.</p><p></p><p>And by the way--I don't think there's anything wrong with upping a monster's hit points on the fly to create more epic combat, <em>if</em> you're doing it because you honestly made a mistake in choosing the monster in the first place because you overestimated it. It's also okay if you think the players are going to be bored if the fight's too easy--and believe me, that can happen. Doing it just because the players are getting lucky or because they outsmarted you, however, is <em>not</em> cool.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 272351, member: 1288"] It's important to remember that including a story does [i]not[/i] always equate to being a plot-nazi or to railroading. My campaigns usually have overriding plot arcs. That's not to say that every game is involved in that plot, but the plot is always there in the background, and is always advanced every few games. (For an example, look at a TV series like Babylon 5.) [i]But...[/i] I do [i]not[/i] remove the players' free will. If they follow the plot hooks, great. If not, well, they may not be in a position to stop something nasty from happening, but they'll get to do other stuff instead. Or, even more frequently, I have basic plot points imagined, but I work them in when and how it best suits what the players are doing. Avoided that really cool story idea I had because they went to one kingdom instead of the other? No problem. I'll either save it, and use it later, or I'll rework it so I can run it where they are now. So yes, I've got a story, and some of it's even planned out, but I mold it, reshape it, and change it as needed to fit the players' actions, not the other way around. None of that, as I see it, is railroading. Refusing to let the PCs make a difference, changing the rules because they "must" be captured for the plot to advance, refusing to let really well-planned tactics work just because they might kill an "important" NPC--[i]that[/i] is evil. Having the basic elements and major plot points of a story planned ahead of time is fine, if you're able to change it on the fly and let the players decide how/when/if elements of it creep into the campaign. And by the way--I don't think there's anything wrong with upping a monster's hit points on the fly to create more epic combat, [i]if[/i] you're doing it because you honestly made a mistake in choosing the monster in the first place because you overestimated it. It's also okay if you think the players are going to be bored if the fight's too easy--and believe me, that can happen. Doing it just because the players are getting lucky or because they outsmarted you, however, is [i]not[/i] cool. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
DMs: Are you a "plot-nazi"?
Top