Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMs, Do you allow your group(s) to play Evil PCs and/or parties, & why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 6978762" data-attributes="member: 29398"><p>Anything goes around here.</p><p></p><p>As DM, if the party want to spend all session pranking each other or whatever...even killing each other, if it comes to that...I'm cool with it; I can sit back and have a beer. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> The only rule is that it stays in character: Eldrahon arguing with Tamarrik is fine, John arguing with Cindy is not. And while the party's busy arguing the opponents are busy doing whatever they're doing that the party was supposed to be preventing...</p><p></p><p>Long-term experience tells me that in any party there's always going to be a run - usually early on - where they want to do each other in, after which it (mostly) settles down.</p><p></p><p>As player, any game where I was forced to play altruistic or heroic characters all the time would lose me pretty fast, as would this:</p><p>As the player who invented the alignment "Neutral Greedy" for a character of mine many years ago, I have to oppose this on principle. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Even the most idealistic-seeming character can have selfish motivations. One I've been running for quite some time now is a LN Wizard-type from a Roman-based society. She's got herself caught up in an overarching save-the-world plot line, into which she's (to all appearances) idealistically jumped with both feet. Why? Because there's not much point in getting on to the Senate and ultimately becoming Empress (her personal long-term goal) if there's nothing left to rule...</p><p></p><p>Think about it: in the game world the quickest - if riskiest - path to riches and fame is adventuring, and people would know this; making "I'm here to get rich" the most obvious motivation there is. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Besides, in original 1e one's motivations for adventuring were almost always personal and-or selfish in one respect: in the end you were out to amass enough resources to be able to fulfill your duties at name level - build your castle, set up your temple, start your guild, set up your research lab, whatever - depending on class.</p><p></p><p>Lan-"this has to be the oldest thread I've seen around here this decade"-efan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 6978762, member: 29398"] Anything goes around here. As DM, if the party want to spend all session pranking each other or whatever...even killing each other, if it comes to that...I'm cool with it; I can sit back and have a beer. :) The only rule is that it stays in character: Eldrahon arguing with Tamarrik is fine, John arguing with Cindy is not. And while the party's busy arguing the opponents are busy doing whatever they're doing that the party was supposed to be preventing... Long-term experience tells me that in any party there's always going to be a run - usually early on - where they want to do each other in, after which it (mostly) settles down. As player, any game where I was forced to play altruistic or heroic characters all the time would lose me pretty fast, as would this: As the player who invented the alignment "Neutral Greedy" for a character of mine many years ago, I have to oppose this on principle. :) Even the most idealistic-seeming character can have selfish motivations. One I've been running for quite some time now is a LN Wizard-type from a Roman-based society. She's got herself caught up in an overarching save-the-world plot line, into which she's (to all appearances) idealistically jumped with both feet. Why? Because there's not much point in getting on to the Senate and ultimately becoming Empress (her personal long-term goal) if there's nothing left to rule... Think about it: in the game world the quickest - if riskiest - path to riches and fame is adventuring, and people would know this; making "I'm here to get rich" the most obvious motivation there is. :) Besides, in original 1e one's motivations for adventuring were almost always personal and-or selfish in one respect: in the end you were out to amass enough resources to be able to fulfill your duties at name level - build your castle, set up your temple, start your guild, set up your research lab, whatever - depending on class. Lan-"this has to be the oldest thread I've seen around here this decade"-efan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMs, Do you allow your group(s) to play Evil PCs and/or parties, & why?
Top