Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Liquidsabre" data-source="post: 1672475" data-attributes="member: 15635">Nope, I love it the way it is. But then again, I'm pretty good at handling the rules and such, so it may just be a matter of desire/experience.As others have said, it's all a matter of trust with your players. In older editions of AD&D the players had NO choice but to trust the rulings of the DM as the rule system could be so diificult to decipher that it left most at a loss for how the the rules worked in many situations. In 3.x D&D we get a little spoiled since the rule system functions quite well in almost every situation, working well in the areas of balance, versatility, and speed of use. Though all of this requires a solid grasp of the rules to benefit from.  I've seen many folk have problems and complained about the system, but upon further investigation it would often be due to a lack of a full-understanding of the rules as written, or a conceptual problem at the heart of the system (such as a dislike for level-based character progression for example).Well normally I'd suggest not running the game since you'd be unable to assist a player with a problem understanding or making use of rules in game play. To be honest I'd play the game and read the books to gain more experience and knowledge of the system before I'd attempt DMing for others. I've found the best games are run by folk that have a good grasp of the rules system.That being said, especially when learning the system for the first time as a group, this is less of a problem if everyone i nthe group is muddling through and learning for the first time together. Barring that, I'd suggest the same as others already have: Make use of your knowledgeable players! As long as you trust your players to know the rules well and to not take advantage of you lack of knowledge for their own gain. Even as a skilled DM in a system you know well it is impossible to know all the rules clearly but you'd better know the core rules such as AoO, movement, Grapple, etc. pretty well or game play could be stalled to the detriment of the game. I trust my players to understand the niche rules concerning the players such as secific spells, class abilities, special feats, etc. without my having to look them up (though likely I too will pick up these rules over time just from the PCs use of them, which is a good thing).Having an asset player in the group who can add rules knowledge and such can speed up game play and generally be quie useful, but taken too far can be hazardous to game play. It's important for the group to look to the DM for rules-advice and for the DM o take this role of leadership and only make use of knowledgeable players as advisors on the matter of rules-decisions. As long as this is clear and understood (and all are comfortable with this) you'll have a smooth running and enjoyable game. If a knowledgeable player takes this to extreme, it could prove damaging to the game experience. But there should be a balance between DM knowledge and player knowledge, as I said above: (1) The DM's responsibility is to possess a solid and broad grasp of the rule system as a whole to effectively manage and adjudicate game play.(2) Players are responsible for knowledge of all the niche-rules concerning the characters and a general grasp of the combat system.So with that said, to continue running the game I'd suggest to make good use of your players as you learn and pick up the rule system. I've found the adage "You don't have to know ALL the rules, you just have to know how to FIND them." to be quite true. As long as you know where to look in the books this will facilitate your learning and speed up game play by reducing the number of pages turned in-game.Best of luck!</blockquote>

Verification