Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
DMs: Fight to Win or Fight for Fun?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 2525845" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>Sure. I, for one, would not have a ghoul perform the CDG while being beat about the head and shoulders either. I would have paralyzed the defender and CDGed them both (if possible). For me, ghouls are not about trying to "take one down with me" -- they're simply very hungry and not especially concerned about their own survival. Which does not mean that they are stupid. Again, active defender = active target.</p><p></p><p>But I do not read the question as "Was there something else I could do?" I read the question as "Was what I had the NPC ghoul do unacceptable?"</p><p></p><p>If the question is "Was there something else I could do?", then regardless of what the DM did, the answer will always be a resounding "YES!" There are always other options.</p><p></p><p>If the question is "Was what I had the NPC do unacceptable?", then there are really two questions at hand:</p><p></p><p>(1) Is it okay for NPCs to CDG PCs? I think that it is not only acceptable, but in some circumstances it is the way to go. As always, ymmv.</p><p></p><p>(2) Is it okay for a ghoul to ignore the defender in order to CDG the fallen? This is a far more difficult question to answer. It depends very much on the dynamic of the game and how you see/describe ghouls. "The PCs (who supposedly value their lives) CDG fallen but defended opponents" would certainly make this seem reasonable for NPCs <em>on the surface</em>, but the YMMV sticker is written in mile-high letters here. Overall, I would say that the ghoul <em>probably</em> should have simply attacked the defender first.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, my overall answer would be, that what the DM did was acceptable, but not the best possible solution in this particular case. But, of course, this depends entirely on how one envisions certain types of monsters, and if I trusted the DM otherwise I would assume that there were reasons for the CDG here, too. Maybe that is how ghouls are in this world. I would certainly fear them more than if they only hamstrung their opponents.</p><p></p><p>Also, I, for one, would never have a ghoul take a hostage. Hostage-taking is completely alien to ghouls, imc.</p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 2525845, member: 18280"] Sure. I, for one, would not have a ghoul perform the CDG while being beat about the head and shoulders either. I would have paralyzed the defender and CDGed them both (if possible). For me, ghouls are not about trying to "take one down with me" -- they're simply very hungry and not especially concerned about their own survival. Which does not mean that they are stupid. Again, active defender = active target. But I do not read the question as "Was there something else I could do?" I read the question as "Was what I had the NPC ghoul do unacceptable?" If the question is "Was there something else I could do?", then regardless of what the DM did, the answer will always be a resounding "YES!" There are always other options. If the question is "Was what I had the NPC do unacceptable?", then there are really two questions at hand: (1) Is it okay for NPCs to CDG PCs? I think that it is not only acceptable, but in some circumstances it is the way to go. As always, ymmv. (2) Is it okay for a ghoul to ignore the defender in order to CDG the fallen? This is a far more difficult question to answer. It depends very much on the dynamic of the game and how you see/describe ghouls. "The PCs (who supposedly value their lives) CDG fallen but defended opponents" would certainly make this seem reasonable for NPCs [I]on the surface[/I], but the YMMV sticker is written in mile-high letters here. Overall, I would say that the ghoul [I]probably[/I] should have simply attacked the defender first. Therefore, my overall answer would be, that what the DM did was acceptable, but not the best possible solution in this particular case. But, of course, this depends entirely on how one envisions certain types of monsters, and if I trusted the DM otherwise I would assume that there were reasons for the CDG here, too. Maybe that is how ghouls are in this world. I would certainly fear them more than if they only hamstrung their opponents. Also, I, for one, would never have a ghoul take a hostage. Hostage-taking is completely alien to ghouls, imc. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
DMs: Fight to Win or Fight for Fun?
Top