Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hong" data-source="post: 927312" data-attributes="member: 537">Not really, no.Is that supposed to be a meaningful statement, or are you just glad to see me?<img src="http://users.bigpond.net.au/hongooi/dead1.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />Waah, the game isn't perfect. You'll excuse me while I search for an umbrella to keep off the sky that is, even now, falling on my head.Supposedly.D00d, we're talking about balance, not flavour. Are you finished killing your strawman yet?Actually, it doesn't.Yes, because, as we all know, 3E consists solely of rangers, bards and barbarians, everyone fights with two weapons, and the only spells available are buff spells.Supposedly.And, even taking into account the flaws that have emerged since 3E's release, it's still pretty well-balanced compared to what came before. Your point is?Waah, the designers actually listen to their customers. You'll excuse me again while I search for that umbrella.Waah, 3.5E is not going to be a perfect snowflake, unique in every way. Where's that damn umbrella already?You're not making sense. Would you like to try again, while I track down that umbrella?What about it?Supposedly.</blockquote>