Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8400011" data-attributes="member: 6801228">But you didn't discuss the actual issue, that's what I've been saying. But you are going to refuse to actually talk about what I'm saying and instead keep ignoring my points because &quot;it worked out&quot; and focusing on pendantism.I'm glad your game worked out. I'm not glad that you overruled the player's vote. If they were okay with getting fewer magical items in exchange for&nbsp; magical items bypassing resistance to non-magical weapons, then you just substituted your own preferences for the vote, making the vote pointless. If they were not okay with that, then either they didn't understand the consequences of their vote (which means you explained it poorly) or they didn't know that information (you hid it from them). The only scenario that works out where you didn't do something potentially skeevy is if they really didn't care about the vote in the first place, and it was close enough that your own vote decided the issue. But from everything you've said, that isn't what happened.No it hasn't. I know many people who play golf or pool or bowling for fun, not to win. Heck, there are sports like golf where the idea of &quot;winning&quot; is pretty hard to figure out. Who are you &quot;winning&quot; against if you are playing a round of golf? The course?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8400011, member: 6801228"] But you didn't discuss the actual issue, that's what I've been saying. But you are going to refuse to actually talk about what I'm saying and instead keep ignoring my points because "it worked out" and focusing on pendantism. I'm glad your game worked out. I'm not glad that you overruled the player's vote. If they were okay with getting fewer magical items in exchange for magical items bypassing resistance to non-magical weapons, then you just substituted your own preferences for the vote, making the vote pointless. If they were not okay with that, then either they didn't understand the consequences of their vote (which means you explained it poorly) or they didn't know that information (you hid it from them). The only scenario that works out where you didn't do something potentially skeevy is if they really didn't care about the vote in the first place, and it was close enough that your own vote decided the issue. But from everything you've said, that isn't what happened. No it hasn't. I know many people who play golf or pool or bowling for fun, not to win. Heck, there are sports like golf where the idea of "winning" is pretty hard to figure out. Who are you "winning" against if you are playing a round of golf? The course? [/QUOTE]

Verification