Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMs what do you think of the new PHB?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UngainlyTitan" data-source="post: 9460761" data-attributes="member: 28487"><p>I think I will chime in again, I have posted in this thread before some positive views on the new PHB and while I have not had the chance to play with the new rules yet (an do not expect to soon) I have had a chance to build a few characters. Both new characters and conversions of existing characters.</p><p></p><p><strong>To Recap:</strong></p><p>The book layout is excellent, and the rules seem clear, (there are known issues), well laid out, and all in the one place. This is a big improvement, but I reserve the option to change my mind because aside from the known and obvious issues, other issues may crop up in the course of actual use in play. Also, the DMG may bring other issues to light.</p><p>This ease of use will be most noticeable to new players.</p><p></p><p>The power of classes has been boosted from the floor of 2014, but I think the ceiling is pretty much the same. I think the wizard is still on top, but the sorcerer is now competitive. I think the power spread is less. I am not sure that there is any class that is now truely simple with the addition of weapon masteries. This is another thing that cannot be really evaluated outside of play.</p><p></p><p>Backgrounds is the most disappointing area for me, in the book. I think that there are not enough backgrounds to cover what is needed and the background format is too restrictive. While it is easy to intuit how to construct custom backgrounds, this should have been included in the book.</p><p>Also, I think it is disappointing that A.S.I.'s and the feats are incorporated into the backgrounds. </p><p>The origin feats are uneven in power level, too much so in my opinion. They vary from ones like Alert that are very strong to ones that are little more than ribbons. </p><p></p><p>The general feats on the other had are excellent. My perception of character building has shifted from being very reluctant (using the 2014 rules) to use feats to becoming very reluctant (in the 2024 rules) to using an A.S.I. To me this is a positive as I like feats in general as they give more variety and flexibility to a character.</p><p></p><p>To new players and groups, I would be unequivocal in recommending this version of the rules over 2014. To an existing group, my advice would be more nuanced and depend on how they felt about the existing rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UngainlyTitan, post: 9460761, member: 28487"] I think I will chime in again, I have posted in this thread before some positive views on the new PHB and while I have not had the chance to play with the new rules yet (an do not expect to soon) I have had a chance to build a few characters. Both new characters and conversions of existing characters. [B]To Recap:[/B] The book layout is excellent, and the rules seem clear, (there are known issues), well laid out, and all in the one place. This is a big improvement, but I reserve the option to change my mind because aside from the known and obvious issues, other issues may crop up in the course of actual use in play. Also, the DMG may bring other issues to light. This ease of use will be most noticeable to new players. The power of classes has been boosted from the floor of 2014, but I think the ceiling is pretty much the same. I think the wizard is still on top, but the sorcerer is now competitive. I think the power spread is less. I am not sure that there is any class that is now truely simple with the addition of weapon masteries. This is another thing that cannot be really evaluated outside of play. Backgrounds is the most disappointing area for me, in the book. I think that there are not enough backgrounds to cover what is needed and the background format is too restrictive. While it is easy to intuit how to construct custom backgrounds, this should have been included in the book. Also, I think it is disappointing that A.S.I.'s and the feats are incorporated into the backgrounds. The origin feats are uneven in power level, too much so in my opinion. They vary from ones like Alert that are very strong to ones that are little more than ribbons. The general feats on the other had are excellent. My perception of character building has shifted from being very reluctant (using the 2014 rules) to use feats to becoming very reluctant (in the 2024 rules) to using an A.S.I. To me this is a positive as I like feats in general as they give more variety and flexibility to a character. To new players and groups, I would be unequivocal in recommending this version of the rules over 2014. To an existing group, my advice would be more nuanced and depend on how they felt about the existing rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMs what do you think of the new PHB?
Top