Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMs what do you think of the new PHB?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Argyle King" data-source="post: 9461008" data-attributes="member: 58416"><p>Various thoughts while looking through a PHB today:</p><p></p><p>•rules index is a step in the right direction</p><p>•while the layout is a vast improvement over 2024, it still feels a little sloppy in a few places. Though, I'm not 100% sure how to explain that. </p><p>•At times, the book feels like it has a lot of wasted space. Much of the artwork is very good (even if not a style that speaks to me personally,) but some of it feels more like trying to fluff the page count.</p><p>•What method was used for the artwork? A lot of pieces make heavy use of shadow in the same way. I'm curious if that's a byproduct of some program used to simulate light and shading effects. </p><p>•I like the large portraits at the beginning of each class description. Kinda reminds me of what Fantasy Flight Games did with Star Wars.</p><p>•Sorcerer Metamagic still leaves a lot up be desired</p><p>•I think the Warlock layout would have been better if the subclass portrait was more often on the same page as the subclass it was supposed to represent</p><p>•Kinda cool to have tiefling sub-species options connected to different planes, though a little odd that they all still end up looking more-or-less the same. </p><p>•Halflings being able to Hide behind other creatures means that questions about the Stealth rules may come up frequently</p><p>•I like most of the species entry artwork. What kind of cookies is the dwarf on the left making? </p><p>•The Gnome piece is still a very good piece, but it also seems like it would be part of a different game. </p><p>•Orcs are now a gray version of Beast Boy from Teen Titans?</p><p>•Reading through 2024 Backgrounds, I still feel like the 2024 approach is a step in the wrong directions. Gaining the freedom to select the feat you want by using a 2014 background is the better option.</p><p>•Despite most of the artwork being sleek and professional, the presentation comes across a bit too sanitized and bland. I imagine that comes down to personal preference. </p><p>•I thought there would be more content to celebrate the anniversary of D&D.</p><p>•Overall, I think that people who want to buy the book will appreciate the improvements. For those who are on the fence, I don't think you're missing out on anything by waiting until the other 2 core books are finished. </p><p>•It's still hard to tell if this will be a revamp like 3.5 that keeps going for a while or if it will be more like Book of 9 Swords that comes out as a late release middle ground between this edition and the next one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Argyle King, post: 9461008, member: 58416"] Various thoughts while looking through a PHB today: •rules index is a step in the right direction •while the layout is a vast improvement over 2024, it still feels a little sloppy in a few places. Though, I'm not 100% sure how to explain that. •At times, the book feels like it has a lot of wasted space. Much of the artwork is very good (even if not a style that speaks to me personally,) but some of it feels more like trying to fluff the page count. •What method was used for the artwork? A lot of pieces make heavy use of shadow in the same way. I'm curious if that's a byproduct of some program used to simulate light and shading effects. •I like the large portraits at the beginning of each class description. Kinda reminds me of what Fantasy Flight Games did with Star Wars. •Sorcerer Metamagic still leaves a lot up be desired •I think the Warlock layout would have been better if the subclass portrait was more often on the same page as the subclass it was supposed to represent •Kinda cool to have tiefling sub-species options connected to different planes, though a little odd that they all still end up looking more-or-less the same. •Halflings being able to Hide behind other creatures means that questions about the Stealth rules may come up frequently •I like most of the species entry artwork. What kind of cookies is the dwarf on the left making? •The Gnome piece is still a very good piece, but it also seems like it would be part of a different game. •Orcs are now a gray version of Beast Boy from Teen Titans? •Reading through 2024 Backgrounds, I still feel like the 2024 approach is a step in the wrong directions. Gaining the freedom to select the feat you want by using a 2014 background is the better option. •Despite most of the artwork being sleek and professional, the presentation comes across a bit too sanitized and bland. I imagine that comes down to personal preference. •I thought there would be more content to celebrate the anniversary of D&D. •Overall, I think that people who want to buy the book will appreciate the improvements. For those who are on the fence, I don't think you're missing out on anything by waiting until the other 2 core books are finished. •It's still hard to tell if this will be a revamp like 3.5 that keeps going for a while or if it will be more like Book of 9 Swords that comes out as a late release middle ground between this edition and the next one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DMs what do you think of the new PHB?
Top