Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="azmodean" data-source="post: 1981745" data-attributes="member: 26590">One comment about the poll question itself, it should probably read something like, &quot;Which of these items would you allow your PCs to purchase/commission?&quot;.&nbsp; A lot of people seem to respond to polls without reading that initial post for clarification, so you can end up with different people answering different questions.It's a minor point, but non-MW full plate does not exist IMC.&nbsp; The masterwork cost is small compared to the cost of the full plate, so it does not seem resonable for a smith to ever make non-MW.The option about non-magical +5 full plate bugs me, it's something I've seen several times.&nbsp; You present an option that is not allowed for or even suggested is possible in the rules, and then tell the poll-takers to assume it exists in their campaign world, which, in most cases it does not.I'm pretty free with magic items IMC, which is very high magic.&nbsp; I generally stick with the gp limits for settlements, with a few exceptions.&nbsp; (scrolls, for instance, have a much higher cl requirement than their price would indicate)&nbsp; And I allow &quot;magic shop&quot; type purchasing, though the characters are actually hunting down individual craftsmen for each item.&nbsp; I just don't feel that situation is important enough to spend time on.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="azmodean, post: 1981745, member: 26590"] One comment about the poll question itself, it should probably read something like, "Which of these items would you allow your PCs to purchase/commission?". A lot of people seem to respond to polls without reading that initial post for clarification, so you can end up with different people answering different questions. It's a minor point, but non-MW full plate does not exist IMC. The masterwork cost is small compared to the cost of the full plate, so it does not seem resonable for a smith to ever make non-MW. The option about non-magical +5 full plate bugs me, it's something I've seen several times. You present an option that is not allowed for or even suggested is possible in the rules, and then tell the poll-takers to assume it exists in their campaign world, which, in most cases it does not. I'm pretty free with magic items IMC, which is very high magic. I generally stick with the gp limits for settlements, with a few exceptions. (scrolls, for instance, have a much higher cl requirement than their price would indicate) And I allow "magic shop" type purchasing, though the characters are actually hunting down individual craftsmen for each item. I just don't feel that situation is important enough to spend time on. [/QUOTE]

Verification