Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DnD cosmology - Which Edition do you prefer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8609708" data-attributes="member: 7032025"><p>Proof ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Proof ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Proof ? I'm sorry, but the fact that you want to play it that way is for me not reflected in the rules. Once more, alignment is not a straight jacket, never has been, and it's been repeated time and time again in all editions that most creatures except aligned planar ones are not consistent with alignment. Doing ONE act out of one's alignment is certainly not necessarily a reason for immediate change. It might, and then it might not, there are no RULES there (except in rare cases like 1e paladin, and even then it was not that black and white).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Huh, no. Once more, you have a proof of that in the very argument that you make below.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that just shows that even planar creatures are not constrained by their alignemtn and it's not ONE act that changed things, but things over time, for a large part of a population.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And this is the part that you are making out of nowhere. Where exactly does it say this ? In any edition ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is your interpretation, but I don't think it's supported by anything rather than your personal view that it's that way. On the contrary, every description of alignment shows that it's not played that way, that people are not consistent with their alignment all the time, and that acts out of alignement don't cause a change immediately. There are shades within each alignement, minor actions will not affect it. But even if major actions might make a change, does not that mean that it can somewhat IGNORE what the past has been ? And this in any direction ?</p><p></p><p>In any case, all of that is so much subject to a DM's interpretation that I will leave your personal interpretation to you, but to you only.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually yes, I can, because I am a Planescape fan and I love these planes. But it's not what I was saying. Let's say that you are LG, first, there is little likelihood that you will, out of the blue, commit an act so hideous that it will shift you all the way to CE or even LE. As mentioned multiple times in multiple editions, few person are completely consistent, and ONE act will probably not make you shift. But even if you do shift, there are many gradations, assuming that it's no longer The Seven Heaven, you might go to Arcadia, Nirvana, Acheron, and it's very unlikely that you will go straight to the Nine Hells.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8609708, member: 7032025"] Proof ? Proof ? Proof ? I'm sorry, but the fact that you want to play it that way is for me not reflected in the rules. Once more, alignment is not a straight jacket, never has been, and it's been repeated time and time again in all editions that most creatures except aligned planar ones are not consistent with alignment. Doing ONE act out of one's alignment is certainly not necessarily a reason for immediate change. It might, and then it might not, there are no RULES there (except in rare cases like 1e paladin, and even then it was not that black and white). Huh, no. Once more, you have a proof of that in the very argument that you make below. And that just shows that even planar creatures are not constrained by their alignemtn and it's not ONE act that changed things, but things over time, for a large part of a population. And this is the part that you are making out of nowhere. Where exactly does it say this ? In any edition ? This is your interpretation, but I don't think it's supported by anything rather than your personal view that it's that way. On the contrary, every description of alignment shows that it's not played that way, that people are not consistent with their alignment all the time, and that acts out of alignement don't cause a change immediately. There are shades within each alignement, minor actions will not affect it. But even if major actions might make a change, does not that mean that it can somewhat IGNORE what the past has been ? And this in any direction ? In any case, all of that is so much subject to a DM's interpretation that I will leave your personal interpretation to you, but to you only. Actually yes, I can, because I am a Planescape fan and I love these planes. But it's not what I was saying. Let's say that you are LG, first, there is little likelihood that you will, out of the blue, commit an act so hideous that it will shift you all the way to CE or even LE. As mentioned multiple times in multiple editions, few person are completely consistent, and ONE act will probably not make you shift. But even if you do shift, there are many gradations, assuming that it's no longer The Seven Heaven, you might go to Arcadia, Nirvana, Acheron, and it's very unlikely that you will go straight to the Nine Hells. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DnD cosmology - Which Edition do you prefer?
Top