Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tangleknot" data-source="post: 6140839" data-attributes="member: 6695854">There was a time when D&amp;D could release content rich source material and still make a hefty profit.&nbsp; 2nd ed, 3rd ed, both successful games and their core books were twice as thick as 4th's.&nbsp;&nbsp; They didn't require a subscription fee to play the game, nor were we forced to buy into their miniatures line.&nbsp; Its greedy what they have done with D&amp;D, they took a highly successful game and decided to make more money, and give the customers less.&nbsp; We deserve a better, and if they choose to repeat this business practice again I'll choose to keep playing other RPG's.I want to mention:&nbsp; Although not as popular Shadowrun and World of Darkness are examples of games that are going on their 2nd decade.&nbsp; They don't care that most players either don't buy a book or only buy the core, they care that people are playing their game.&nbsp; They make enough money that their business continues to grow.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tangleknot, post: 6140839, member: 6695854"] There was a time when D&D could release content rich source material and still make a hefty profit. 2nd ed, 3rd ed, both successful games and their core books were twice as thick as 4th's. They didn't require a subscription fee to play the game, nor were we forced to buy into their miniatures line. Its greedy what they have done with D&D, they took a highly successful game and decided to make more money, and give the customers less. We deserve a better, and if they choose to repeat this business practice again I'll choose to keep playing other RPG's. I want to mention: Although not as popular Shadowrun and World of Darkness are examples of games that are going on their 2nd decade. They don't care that most players either don't buy a book or only buy the core, they care that people are playing their game. They make enough money that their business continues to grow. [/QUOTE]

Verification