Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do DM's feel that Sharpshooter & Great Weapon Master overpowered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 6914762" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>Of course the character is going to take <strong>a</strong> penalty. It's just not the one you are thinking off. Because the opportunity cost of the feat is +2 ASI, that means that STR/DEX mod is one less. So every single attack they make, regardless if they are engaging the feat or not, is at -1/-1.</p><p></p><p>So if the baseline is +2 ASI, then compared to that the feat either gives:</p><p></p><p>-1 to hit / -1 to damage (when not using it)</p><p>OR</p><p>-6 to hit / +9 to damage (when using it)</p><p></p><p>So either you are strictly inferior with -1/-1, or you're getting about +1.5 damage potential for every point of to hit you are losing, but that lost to hit means that you are also gabling the base damage.</p><p></p><p>Let's try a few examples. I'll start 50/50 and go up and down.</p><p>Baseline: Greatssword (2d6 avg 7) +5 (str, magic, whatever) = 12 avg damage</p><p>GWF: Greatsword but -2 STR = 11 avg damage.</p><p></p><p>If baseline has a 50% chance to hit, that's 6 expected damage per attack (50% * 12)</p><p>GWF not using it has a 45% for 11 damage = 4.95</p><p>GWF using it has a 20% for 21 damage = 4.2 damage</p><p>Okay, even chance to hit definitely favors not taking the feat.</p><p></p><p>Let's try +3 AC harder to hit.</p><p>Baseline has a 35% for 12 = 4.2</p><p>GWF not in use = 30% for 11 = 3.3</p><p>GWF in use is 5% for 21 = 1.05</p><p>As expected, anything harder makes the feat even worse.</p><p></p><p>Let's go -3 AC easier to hit.</p><p>Baseline has a 65% for 12 = 7.8</p><p>GWF not using it has 60% * 11 = 6.6</p><p>GWF in use has 35% * 21 = 7.35</p><p>Hmm, GWF is pulling close, but it's still better not to have taken the feat. But at least if you had taken the feat it's finally better to use it then ignore it.</p><p></p><p>Let's go up another to -6 to AC, make it REALLY easy to hit.</p><p>Baseline has 80% for 12 = 9.6</p><p>GWF not using 75% for 11 = 8.25</p><p>GWF using it 50% for 21 = 10.5</p><p>Woo, GWF is finally better!</p><p></p><p>So it looks like the majority of the time GWF gives you less damage per round then the +2 ASI would, but against very easy to hit opponents it gives more damage. What that averages out to depends on the foes your DM throws at you and how much buffing you receive.</p><p></p><p>To shoot holes in my own argument, once a character maxes their attack stat and the the opportunity cost is not longer being charged against it, the dynamic changes. Now it's giving you an option without a corresponding cost in that category, so that category improves unilaterally.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 6914762, member: 20564"] Of course the character is going to take [b]a[/b] penalty. It's just not the one you are thinking off. Because the opportunity cost of the feat is +2 ASI, that means that STR/DEX mod is one less. So every single attack they make, regardless if they are engaging the feat or not, is at -1/-1. So if the baseline is +2 ASI, then compared to that the feat either gives: -1 to hit / -1 to damage (when not using it) OR -6 to hit / +9 to damage (when using it) So either you are strictly inferior with -1/-1, or you're getting about +1.5 damage potential for every point of to hit you are losing, but that lost to hit means that you are also gabling the base damage. Let's try a few examples. I'll start 50/50 and go up and down. Baseline: Greatssword (2d6 avg 7) +5 (str, magic, whatever) = 12 avg damage GWF: Greatsword but -2 STR = 11 avg damage. If baseline has a 50% chance to hit, that's 6 expected damage per attack (50% * 12) GWF not using it has a 45% for 11 damage = 4.95 GWF using it has a 20% for 21 damage = 4.2 damage Okay, even chance to hit definitely favors not taking the feat. Let's try +3 AC harder to hit. Baseline has a 35% for 12 = 4.2 GWF not in use = 30% for 11 = 3.3 GWF in use is 5% for 21 = 1.05 As expected, anything harder makes the feat even worse. Let's go -3 AC easier to hit. Baseline has a 65% for 12 = 7.8 GWF not using it has 60% * 11 = 6.6 GWF in use has 35% * 21 = 7.35 Hmm, GWF is pulling close, but it's still better not to have taken the feat. But at least if you had taken the feat it's finally better to use it then ignore it. Let's go up another to -6 to AC, make it REALLY easy to hit. Baseline has 80% for 12 = 9.6 GWF not using 75% for 11 = 8.25 GWF using it 50% for 21 = 10.5 Woo, GWF is finally better! So it looks like the majority of the time GWF gives you less damage per round then the +2 ASI would, but against very easy to hit opponents it gives more damage. What that averages out to depends on the foes your DM throws at you and how much buffing you receive. To shoot holes in my own argument, once a character maxes their attack stat and the the opportunity cost is not longer being charged against it, the dynamic changes. Now it's giving you an option without a corresponding cost in that category, so that category improves unilaterally. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do DM's feel that Sharpshooter & Great Weapon Master overpowered?
Top