Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 6916530" data-attributes="member: 6701872">I've noticed something about your math; I can't seem to duplicate it when making what seemed based on your data provided to be the same assumptions.My assumptions of a 5th level barbarian, in a rage, with the only difference for purposes of comparison being Great Weapon Master feat vs. 2 higher strength, lead me to a 16 strength with the feat vs. 18 strength without it - and with those assumptions alone, not adding in other factors that create a combination and thus invalidate the comparison, I'm seeing not only much smaller DPR numbers than you have listed (around 15, rather than around 25), but I am also seeing the DPR of the 2 higher strength higher than the DPR of the feat user (15.65 over two attacks with a greataxe vs. 13.55 over two attacks with a greataxe and using great weapon master's -5/+10).Could you elaborate upon your math, and the assumptions behind it, so I can see why your math just doesn't even kind of line up with mine?</blockquote>