Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 6916545" data-attributes="member: 6701872">I don't find that to be true. If we ignore that a feature only applies in certain situations and analyze that feature as if it were universally applicable, how could we possibly feel our assessment is fully accurate?In fact, I think this might be the core point explaining how some people arrive at the conclusion that these feats are &quot;over powered&quot;; by considering that they always apply. Even if that is true in a particular campaign, it is not the feat, but the campaign, which has created the issue - and a feat not working for a particular campaign doesn't mean that feat doesn't work at all.I've got high-level characters at my table, and they are played by experienced players, and yet this thing you insist will happen has not.Also, it's a bit rude to insist that what you view as &quot;not-unoptimal play&quot; is the only possible result of when players &quot;level up&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AaronOfBarbaria, post: 6916545, member: 6701872"] I don't find that to be true. If we ignore that a feature only applies in certain situations and analyze that feature as if it were universally applicable, how could we possibly feel our assessment is fully accurate? In fact, I think this might be the core point explaining how some people arrive at the conclusion that these feats are "over powered"; by considering that they always apply. Even if that is true in a particular campaign, it is not the feat, but the campaign, which has created the issue - and a feat not working for a particular campaign doesn't mean that feat doesn't work at all. I've got high-level characters at my table, and they are played by experienced players, and yet this thing you insist will happen has not. Also, it's a bit rude to insist that what you view as "not-unoptimal play" is the only possible result of when players "level up" [/QUOTE]

Verification