Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do Entangle, Grease and Web ruin D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 1738669" data-attributes="member: 158"><p>I do see a small number of DM's who want to eliminate any spell that does something besides deal damage. It's not a position I agree with, and a D&D game that has no harmful spells except damage dealers seems less fun to me in play. I like the broader tactical options in play, and reducing all spells to just "damage or information or buffing" just seems to cheapen it for me.</p><p></p><p>Grease, Web, and Entangle all have in common that they restrict movement by area, and they are persistent. Since we use miniatures and a battlemat, this is not a problem for us, since spell effects are marked with wet erase - same as for any wall spell or fog effect. Perhaps it's because Web has such a NASTY requirement for movement (either excessive strength or a skill which no one but rogues seem to take) that people get upset with it.</p><p></p><p>If web becomes a problem, I would suggest one fix would be to simplify the "stuck" rules - make it like jump, with solid DC's per target. Perhaps the move is at least 5 feet per round, and a dc10 check will make it ten feet, dc 15 will be 15 feet, etc. - making it a little easier to adjudicate, and ensuring that people with bad dice rolls won't be sitting immobile the entire time. Perhaps entangle could be edited the same way, making the target numbers easy for a player to eyeball in the middle of combat. It doesn't make sense to me that they should go to all the trouble of de-powering hold person, yet another 2nd level spell ALL BUT makes a person helpless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Henry, post: 1738669, member: 158"] I do see a small number of DM's who want to eliminate any spell that does something besides deal damage. It's not a position I agree with, and a D&D game that has no harmful spells except damage dealers seems less fun to me in play. I like the broader tactical options in play, and reducing all spells to just "damage or information or buffing" just seems to cheapen it for me. Grease, Web, and Entangle all have in common that they restrict movement by area, and they are persistent. Since we use miniatures and a battlemat, this is not a problem for us, since spell effects are marked with wet erase - same as for any wall spell or fog effect. Perhaps it's because Web has such a NASTY requirement for movement (either excessive strength or a skill which no one but rogues seem to take) that people get upset with it. If web becomes a problem, I would suggest one fix would be to simplify the "stuck" rules - make it like jump, with solid DC's per target. Perhaps the move is at least 5 feet per round, and a dc10 check will make it ten feet, dc 15 will be 15 feet, etc. - making it a little easier to adjudicate, and ensuring that people with bad dice rolls won't be sitting immobile the entire time. Perhaps entangle could be edited the same way, making the target numbers easy for a player to eyeball in the middle of combat. It doesn't make sense to me that they should go to all the trouble of de-powering hold person, yet another 2nd level spell ALL BUT makes a person helpless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do Entangle, Grease and Web ruin D&D?
Top