Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GMforPowergamers" data-source="post: 6729781" data-attributes="member: 67338">I think you are doing a major disservice here...again I would go with a much larger non magic % yea, of the 9 schools 3 of them were mostly magiac and 6 of them were mostly not... well part of that can be fixed with a 5e make over... just like the spells got. Instead of a power at level X that gives 2 attacks and one at level y that gives 3, and one at level z that gives 4, or the mtn hammer line (+2d6 damage and ignore dr, +4d6 damage and ignore dr, ect) can be combined and scale somehow...the problem is people (maybe not you) are too quick to call power creep. If a new fighter sub class, or a full class (someone said warblade up thread) did less damage then a fighter, had less attacks but lots of extra options, and once per short rest could thereticly nova to do more single round damage then a fighter, but still less single round damage then a disintagrat at level 11, is that power creep?</blockquote>