Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do more choices make us happier (in gaming)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 5150306" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>Didn't read all the thread, but I'll throw in 2 cp anyway.</p><p></p><p>Isn't a lot of this a perception of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunity_cost" target="_blank">Opportunity Cost</a>? </p><p></p><p>For example, if I want to build a big-tough-brute, my racial choices incur an Opportunity Cost (OC for short). If my choices are human, elf, dwarf, and halfling, my choice is pretty easy; its going to be human or dwarf. All that matters is specific racial traits (bonus feat, or con bump for example). </p><p></p><p>Now, add half-orc, half-elf, and gnome to the mix. Suddenly, my OC raises because of half-orc (the quint brute race). I might really want that +2 Str, but do I want to give up that +2 con or bonus feat? </p><p></p><p>My OC rises further with every optional race that fits the brute role: half-ogre gives strength AND con, but at an LA. Minotaur is really awesome, but has racial HD. Orc is stronger, and dumber, than half-orc. Goliath is kinda like a Half-ogre but with a reasonable LA. Etc, Etc. Maybe I want the minotaurs cunning, but I really like the visual of a half-ogre, for example. And my NEXT PC is so going to be a goliath druid...</p><p></p><p>When there was four races, the OC was the other three races. Since two didn't fit, the OC was really the other one (dwarf or human). Each new race adds another OC, since if I pick human (for example), I'm not just skipping dwarf, but also half-orc, half ogre, orc, goliath, etc all of whom would have fit my "brute" role just as well. (Or a lot better than elf would). </p><p></p><p>So the idea that added choice brings unhappiness is rooted in the "roads not taken", if your only choice for a brute is four races (two of which don't work anyway) then picking human over dwarf is mildly low OC. If you have dozens of other races mentioned above, the OC raises with each race that could've done the job well too. </p><p></p><p>The trade off for getting the "right fit" I guess...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 5150306, member: 7635"] Didn't read all the thread, but I'll throw in 2 cp anyway. Isn't a lot of this a perception of [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunity_cost"]Opportunity Cost[/URL]? For example, if I want to build a big-tough-brute, my racial choices incur an Opportunity Cost (OC for short). If my choices are human, elf, dwarf, and halfling, my choice is pretty easy; its going to be human or dwarf. All that matters is specific racial traits (bonus feat, or con bump for example). Now, add half-orc, half-elf, and gnome to the mix. Suddenly, my OC raises because of half-orc (the quint brute race). I might really want that +2 Str, but do I want to give up that +2 con or bonus feat? My OC rises further with every optional race that fits the brute role: half-ogre gives strength AND con, but at an LA. Minotaur is really awesome, but has racial HD. Orc is stronger, and dumber, than half-orc. Goliath is kinda like a Half-ogre but with a reasonable LA. Etc, Etc. Maybe I want the minotaurs cunning, but I really like the visual of a half-ogre, for example. And my NEXT PC is so going to be a goliath druid... When there was four races, the OC was the other three races. Since two didn't fit, the OC was really the other one (dwarf or human). Each new race adds another OC, since if I pick human (for example), I'm not just skipping dwarf, but also half-orc, half ogre, orc, goliath, etc all of whom would have fit my "brute" role just as well. (Or a lot better than elf would). So the idea that added choice brings unhappiness is rooted in the "roads not taken", if your only choice for a brute is four races (two of which don't work anyway) then picking human over dwarf is mildly low OC. If you have dozens of other races mentioned above, the OC raises with each race that could've done the job well too. The trade off for getting the "right fit" I guess... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do more choices make us happier (in gaming)?
Top