Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="IceBear" data-source="post: 448702" data-attributes="member: 1118">Well, there are several places in this thread where you placed some emphasis on words to show exactly how you felt about the person.  You're snide remarks about how you wanted to play a monk or a deep woods sniper in my campaign obviously reveals that you think my campaign style is obviously flawed because you would rule the world in that campaign.And I WAS keeping it polite until that post.  You were the one that placed the innuendo in your post that my campaign was poor compared to yours.And yes, in general, I've never really read a postive posting from you so in general none of your posts have ever contributed anything to me understanding the rules any better than before, so thus, a waste of my timeLastly, I'm sorry if you took it as me DEMANDING that you be consistent.  Never meant that.  Your campaign - do what you want.  I was SUGGESTING (much different thing) that you keep things consistent to avoid issues.I've been trying to say that I DO agree with you if you wanted to get rid of autosuccess or autofailures for quite some time, just that it wasn't for me.  Is that not enough for you?IceBear</blockquote>