Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do players need something cool every level?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DarkKestral" data-source="post: 3120537" data-attributes="member: 40100"><p>Yes, but I think for the most part, new spell levels count (though not levels which don't give more access to spells, really), and class abilities that are always in the player's direct control. (Familiars may be controlled by the DM, depending on how the DM runs things.) Favored enemy is a 'cool thing', even though it's not always active due to DM decisions, because the choices cover all eventualities, and therefore, the player gets to choose when it's active.</p><p></p><p>HP/BAB/Saves/skill points normally don't count, IMO, unless they are far far better than 'normal'. Monk's triple good saves is a 'cool thing' because next to no classes get all good saves, and most don't even get two good saves. A rogue's skillpoints are good, because most classes only get 2 or 4 skill points per level, so rogues far exceed anyone else in skill access, which makes it a 'cool thing'. HP/BAB would have to be something like d20 HD, or BAB +1.5, because good/average BAB's still fairly common. (Three classes have good BAB in core.. and martial classes aren't uncommon)</p><p></p><p>Sorcerors, Clerics, and Fighters, because they don't have cool things that aren't part of a common mechanic at very many levels, (sorcerors and clerics not at anything but first, and fighter not at all) are generally considered 'front-loaded' classes, because you can generally find PrC's that give the basic benefit of the class to a lesser/equal degree, but more numerous special abilities that make characters more unique. Clerical turning attempts, if undead aren't being used, aren't a cool schtick, unless they are used w/ feats or class/racial abilities that provide alternate uses for them.</p><p></p><p>A fighter's feat access isn't really THAT terribly special: many classes give bonus feats to some degree, and characters all get at 7 feats in the course of levels 1-20 anyway.</p><p></p><p>Clerical turning attempts, if undead aren't being used, aren't a 'cool thing' every level, since cleric levels rarely matter in the things that they are used for.</p><p></p><p>A sorceror's or wizard's familiar isn't a cool thing, since while the familiars get more options, in most games, familiars aren't used, since they cost the player XP and take a long time to get back if the familar dies, and they aren't significantly more powerful than a paladin's mount or a ranger or druid's animal companion, which don't cost the player XP at death and can come back almost immediately.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, there are 3 classes which are INCREDIBLY front-loaded: cleric, sorceror, and fighter. These are also the three classes at least 90% of players will always PrC when possible, because they recognize the lack of interest when leveling. </p><p></p><p>Likewise, at level 20, there are very few reasons to keep with a rogue for that level, because at that point, most skills are incredibly augmented with magical items anyway, and it's unlikely all of them will need to be kept up at full. Thus, many players will go with monk if it's available to them for the purposes of saves, HP, +Wis to unarmored AC, Improved Unarmed Strike, a bonus feat, and Flurry of Blows, as well as a few exotic weapon proficiencies... Since there is a feat which gives 5 skillpoints, and 3 feats that give 2 to saves, it's apparent that a single monk level is significantly more powerful than the 20th rogue level, as it offers far more than the rogue's 20th level.</p><p></p><p>This is a few reasons for why I think 'cool things' given out to each class at all levels is a good idea. 'Dead' levels suck, especially for fighters (since all classes get something better on their dead levels than the fighter does (barbs get better HD, equal saves, better skills, AND equal BAB, so strictly, a single barb dead level is better than the fighter's)), because it's like you haven't gotten anything, but other people did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DarkKestral, post: 3120537, member: 40100"] Yes, but I think for the most part, new spell levels count (though not levels which don't give more access to spells, really), and class abilities that are always in the player's direct control. (Familiars may be controlled by the DM, depending on how the DM runs things.) Favored enemy is a 'cool thing', even though it's not always active due to DM decisions, because the choices cover all eventualities, and therefore, the player gets to choose when it's active. HP/BAB/Saves/skill points normally don't count, IMO, unless they are far far better than 'normal'. Monk's triple good saves is a 'cool thing' because next to no classes get all good saves, and most don't even get two good saves. A rogue's skillpoints are good, because most classes only get 2 or 4 skill points per level, so rogues far exceed anyone else in skill access, which makes it a 'cool thing'. HP/BAB would have to be something like d20 HD, or BAB +1.5, because good/average BAB's still fairly common. (Three classes have good BAB in core.. and martial classes aren't uncommon) Sorcerors, Clerics, and Fighters, because they don't have cool things that aren't part of a common mechanic at very many levels, (sorcerors and clerics not at anything but first, and fighter not at all) are generally considered 'front-loaded' classes, because you can generally find PrC's that give the basic benefit of the class to a lesser/equal degree, but more numerous special abilities that make characters more unique. Clerical turning attempts, if undead aren't being used, aren't a cool schtick, unless they are used w/ feats or class/racial abilities that provide alternate uses for them. A fighter's feat access isn't really THAT terribly special: many classes give bonus feats to some degree, and characters all get at 7 feats in the course of levels 1-20 anyway. Clerical turning attempts, if undead aren't being used, aren't a 'cool thing' every level, since cleric levels rarely matter in the things that they are used for. A sorceror's or wizard's familiar isn't a cool thing, since while the familiars get more options, in most games, familiars aren't used, since they cost the player XP and take a long time to get back if the familar dies, and they aren't significantly more powerful than a paladin's mount or a ranger or druid's animal companion, which don't cost the player XP at death and can come back almost immediately. Therefore, there are 3 classes which are INCREDIBLY front-loaded: cleric, sorceror, and fighter. These are also the three classes at least 90% of players will always PrC when possible, because they recognize the lack of interest when leveling. Likewise, at level 20, there are very few reasons to keep with a rogue for that level, because at that point, most skills are incredibly augmented with magical items anyway, and it's unlikely all of them will need to be kept up at full. Thus, many players will go with monk if it's available to them for the purposes of saves, HP, +Wis to unarmored AC, Improved Unarmed Strike, a bonus feat, and Flurry of Blows, as well as a few exotic weapon proficiencies... Since there is a feat which gives 5 skillpoints, and 3 feats that give 2 to saves, it's apparent that a single monk level is significantly more powerful than the 20th rogue level, as it offers far more than the rogue's 20th level. This is a few reasons for why I think 'cool things' given out to each class at all levels is a good idea. 'Dead' levels suck, especially for fighters (since all classes get something better on their dead levels than the fighter does (barbs get better HD, equal saves, better skills, AND equal BAB, so strictly, a single barb dead level is better than the fighter's)), because it's like you haven't gotten anything, but other people did. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do players need something cool every level?
Top