Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do players really want balance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 9481896" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>That is identical to the AD&D text (DMG p 141), which I quoted some of. And it is followed by the same table of percentage chances to not be seen.</p><p></p><p>And I don't see how this AD&D version is any different from a 5e version of the cloak that reads like this?</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">A <em>cloak of elvenkind </em>is of a plain neutral gray which is indistinguishable from any sort of ordinary cloak of the same color. However, when it is worn, with the hood drawn up around he head, it enables the wearer to be nearly invisible, for the<em> cloak</em> has chameleon-like powers. In the outdoors, the wearer of a <em>cloak of elvenkind </em>is almost totally invisible in natural surroundings, nearly so in other settings (+10 to Dexterity (Stealth) checks made to hide in natural surroundings, or +5 otherwise). Note that the wearer is easily seen if violently or hastily moving, regardless of the surroundings.</p><p></p><p>I mean, here is the published 5e version (<a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/magic-items/4606-cloak-of-elvenkind" target="_blank">https://www.dndbeyond.com/magic-items/4606-cloak-of-elvenkind</a>):</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">While you wear this cloak with its hood up, Wisdom (Perception) checks made to see you have disadvantage, and you have advantage on Dexterity (Stealth) checks made to hide, as the cloak's color shifts to camouflage you. Pulling the hood up or down requires an action.</p><p></p><p>This could easily be rewritten to incorporate the AD&D descriptive text (but dropping the distinction between natural and other surroundings):</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">A <em>cloak of elvenkind </em>is of a plain neutral gray which is indistinguishable from any sort of ordinary cloak of the same color. However, when it is worn, with the hood drawn up around he head, it enables the wearer to be nearly invisible, for the<em> cloak</em> has chameleon-like powers: Wisdom (Perception) checks made to see the wearer have disadvantage, and the wearer has advantage on Dexterity (Stealth) checks made to hide. Pulling the hood up or down requires an action.</p><p></p><p>So I'm not really sure what your point is. You posted that "they all have to have a firm rule with all the rough edges sanded down. We can’t just have a cloak that lets you meld into a shadow - it instead just gives you Advantage on Stealth rolls, or a +X modifier. To me that’s very, very boring." But the rules for the % chance to hide in AD&D were just as firm - the rules for the cloak didn't simply states "You meld into a shadow". I don't understand why a list of % chances to hide (which is not integrated with other rules, like a ranger's better chance not to be surprised) is less boring than a rule about a bonus to a stat or skill check.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 9481896, member: 42582"] That is identical to the AD&D text (DMG p 141), which I quoted some of. And it is followed by the same table of percentage chances to not be seen. And I don't see how this AD&D version is any different from a 5e version of the cloak that reads like this? [indent]A [I]cloak of elvenkind [/I]is of a plain neutral gray which is indistinguishable from any sort of ordinary cloak of the same color. However, when it is worn, with the hood drawn up around he head, it enables the wearer to be nearly invisible, for the[I] cloak[/I] has chameleon-like powers. In the outdoors, the wearer of a [I]cloak of elvenkind [/I]is almost totally invisible in natural surroundings, nearly so in other settings (+10 to Dexterity (Stealth) checks made to hide in natural surroundings, or +5 otherwise). Note that the wearer is easily seen if violently or hastily moving, regardless of the surroundings.[/indent] I mean, here is the published 5e version ([URL]https://www.dndbeyond.com/magic-items/4606-cloak-of-elvenkind[/URL]): [indent]While you wear this cloak with its hood up, Wisdom (Perception) checks made to see you have disadvantage, and you have advantage on Dexterity (Stealth) checks made to hide, as the cloak's color shifts to camouflage you. Pulling the hood up or down requires an action.[/indent] This could easily be rewritten to incorporate the AD&D descriptive text (but dropping the distinction between natural and other surroundings): [indent]A [I]cloak of elvenkind [/I]is of a plain neutral gray which is indistinguishable from any sort of ordinary cloak of the same color. However, when it is worn, with the hood drawn up around he head, it enables the wearer to be nearly invisible, for the[I] cloak[/I] has chameleon-like powers: Wisdom (Perception) checks made to see the wearer have disadvantage, and the wearer has advantage on Dexterity (Stealth) checks made to hide. Pulling the hood up or down requires an action.[/indent] So I'm not really sure what your point is. You posted that "they all have to have a firm rule with all the rough edges sanded down. We can’t just have a cloak that lets you meld into a shadow - it instead just gives you Advantage on Stealth rolls, or a +X modifier. To me that’s very, very boring." But the rules for the % chance to hide in AD&D were just as firm - the rules for the cloak didn't simply states "You meld into a shadow". I don't understand why a list of % chances to hide (which is not integrated with other rules, like a ranger's better chance not to be surprised) is less boring than a rule about a bonus to a stat or skill check. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do players really want balance?
Top