Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do players really want balance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest 7037866" data-source="post: 9481940"><p>Well, they sort of have though, haven't they...?</p><p></p><p>I mean the 6-8 medium/hard guidelines are exactly that--guidelines--as in guidance. When I first started 5E from an AD&D background, I vastly overjudged what I thought PCs could handle because in AD&D they could handle such encounters. Now, they really can't at the same level.</p><p></p><p>I decided to work on a summary of my campaign encounters to date. The encounter difficulty distribution of the 77 encounters so far is 30% easy, 15% moderate, 35% hard, and 20% deadly. The (adjusted) XP value for the average encounter is <em>almost exactly half</em> of the deadly max (so for level 1, that would be 100 xp per PC), with the maximum adjusted XP value at 165% of that barrier between hard and deadly. That means on average my encounters are half of max deadly value, which is the maximum of moderate. In other words, nearly exactly between moderate and hard.</p><p></p><p>I think it would have been helpful if the designers assigned values to the encounter difficulties:</p><p></p><p>1 - easy</p><p>2 - moderate</p><p>3 - hard</p><p>4 - deadly</p><p></p><p>At 6-8 (say 7) moderate to hard (2.5) that gives 17.5 "encounter points". If you spend those points given the values above, with say a short rest about every 5-7 points, it works out well IME.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In the easy encounters, a few hp might be lost or some ammo spent, etc. but that is about it.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In moderate encounters, spell slots are typically used but at a minimum, hp is likely reduced, a potion or such might be consumed.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In hard encounters, spell slots are used, even a big whammie maybe, hp depletion is promenent and wider spread--not just the tanks. Magic items used are likely spent.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In deadly encounters, everything is on the table. Players understand this is when they <em>have</em> to use resources and recovery (a short or long rest) is likely needed.</li> </ul><p>You throw two deadly encounters at PCs without any rest in between, and they are likely feeling the sting of attrition. A moderate and hard in tandem and spell casters might start wondering how much they can use a spell slot on the next encounter. An easy follow-up encounter makes the players relax--all in not doom and gloom, but that last medium encounter might just be too much after so many resources are gone.</p><p></p><p>I (quite literally!) see this sort of attrition-based game play work all the time. But, there is a point I would like to address in that: this is on the "adventure" day--during the actual adventure, not just random encounters while travelling, etc. Travelling days are often much easier as random encounters don't tend to cluster like adventure encounters do, with little chance to rest in between.</p><p></p><p>I'll give you a summary of the encounters for my last three sessions. The PCs had just discovered the enterance to a cave system where water was flooding from (ruining the region!). We had a scroll of Water Breathing, so had 24 hours to finish the mission before we had to return. For our 4 PCs the encounters were:</p><p></p><p><strong>Session 1:</strong></p><p>1. Two water weirds (moderate)</p><p>2. A giant shark and a sahuagin (hard)</p><p>3. Two sahuagin priestesses and a merrow (hard)</p><p><strong>- short rest -</strong></p><p>4. Six sahuagin coral smashers (hard)</p><p><strong>- short rest -</strong></p><p>5. A Kraken priest (BBEG) and five sahuagin coral smashers (deadly)</p><p><strong>- long rest -</strong></p><p></p><p>Using the above point system: 2+3+3 (rest) +3 (rest) +4 (long rest) = 15. Not guite the 17.5, but close. We could have handled another moderate encounter probably at most without <em>serious</em> risk of TPK...</p><p></p><p><strong>Session 2:</strong> <em>the players decided to remove the remaining threats to the area</em></p><p>1. Four merrows (hard)</p><p>2. Four swarms of quippers (easy, avoided)</p><p>3. A water elemental and a sahuagin (hard)</p><p><strong>- short rest -</strong></p><p>4. Four hunter sharks (hard)</p><p>5. Two sahuagin priestesses (moderate)</p><p>x. Two merfolk (allied - no point cost)</p><p>6a. Two sahuagins (easy)</p><p></p><p><strong>Session 3:</strong> <em>battle resumed after the two sahuagins when their companions came</em></p><p>6b. Four sahuagins and two sea hags -- the merfolk we allied with (hard, resulted in PC death)</p><p><strong>- short rest -</strong> (we didn't have time for another long rest but we REALLY wanted it)</p><p>7. Six sahuagin coral smashers (hard), this used a lot of our last ditch resources like <em>relentless endurance</em> on BOTH half-orc PCs... The PCs were nearly exhausted of all resources. Now, losing the healer in the prior encounter really made this one hurt.</p><p>x. Ten merfolk and four reef sharks (allied - no point cost)</p><p>STORY AWARD: finally closed portal</p><p><strong>- long rest -</strong> (on the surface)</p><p></p><p>3+1+3 (rest) +3+2+1+3 (rest) + 3 (long rest) = 19. A bit over the 17.5, and we felt it at the 16 point mark! Between the two "adventuring days" for sessions 1-3 above, the total is 34 points, just one shy of the 35 average.</p><p></p><p>Now, the PCs could have gone in different directions changing the encounter order, and they would have had to adjust the rest schedule to match it--wondering if the next encounter might be too much to handle with their current resources levels.</p><p></p><p>The "sahuagin lair" was designed around the world implications for the cave system map, random rolls for encounter difficulty (based on the WOLRD, not the PCs!!!, but this is another point not directly connected to the guidelines in the DMG...), and a search to find creatures appropriate to the encounter difficulty, story, etc.</p><p></p><p>In the long run, IME, it tends to work itself out.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: I just realized a point system of </p><p></p><p>1- easy</p><p>2- moderate</p><p>4- hard</p><p>8- deadly</p><p></p><p>at 6-8 moderate/hard encounters would generate 21 points on average. So, one hard and two deadly encounters--which likely might require a short rest after each, would give you the attrition needed for an adventuring day most likely. I prefer to spread it out a bit more, but it might work...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 7037866, post: 9481940"] Well, they sort of have though, haven't they...? I mean the 6-8 medium/hard guidelines are exactly that--guidelines--as in guidance. When I first started 5E from an AD&D background, I vastly overjudged what I thought PCs could handle because in AD&D they could handle such encounters. Now, they really can't at the same level. I decided to work on a summary of my campaign encounters to date. The encounter difficulty distribution of the 77 encounters so far is 30% easy, 15% moderate, 35% hard, and 20% deadly. The (adjusted) XP value for the average encounter is [I]almost exactly half[/I] of the deadly max (so for level 1, that would be 100 xp per PC), with the maximum adjusted XP value at 165% of that barrier between hard and deadly. That means on average my encounters are half of max deadly value, which is the maximum of moderate. In other words, nearly exactly between moderate and hard. I think it would have been helpful if the designers assigned values to the encounter difficulties: 1 - easy 2 - moderate 3 - hard 4 - deadly At 6-8 (say 7) moderate to hard (2.5) that gives 17.5 "encounter points". If you spend those points given the values above, with say a short rest about every 5-7 points, it works out well IME. [LIST] [*]In the easy encounters, a few hp might be lost or some ammo spent, etc. but that is about it. [*]In moderate encounters, spell slots are typically used but at a minimum, hp is likely reduced, a potion or such might be consumed. [*]In hard encounters, spell slots are used, even a big whammie maybe, hp depletion is promenent and wider spread--not just the tanks. Magic items used are likely spent. [*]In deadly encounters, everything is on the table. Players understand this is when they [I]have[/I] to use resources and recovery (a short or long rest) is likely needed. [/LIST] You throw two deadly encounters at PCs without any rest in between, and they are likely feeling the sting of attrition. A moderate and hard in tandem and spell casters might start wondering how much they can use a spell slot on the next encounter. An easy follow-up encounter makes the players relax--all in not doom and gloom, but that last medium encounter might just be too much after so many resources are gone. I (quite literally!) see this sort of attrition-based game play work all the time. But, there is a point I would like to address in that: this is on the "adventure" day--during the actual adventure, not just random encounters while travelling, etc. Travelling days are often much easier as random encounters don't tend to cluster like adventure encounters do, with little chance to rest in between. I'll give you a summary of the encounters for my last three sessions. The PCs had just discovered the enterance to a cave system where water was flooding from (ruining the region!). We had a scroll of Water Breathing, so had 24 hours to finish the mission before we had to return. For our 4 PCs the encounters were: [B]Session 1:[/B] 1. Two water weirds (moderate) 2. A giant shark and a sahuagin (hard) 3. Two sahuagin priestesses and a merrow (hard) [B]- short rest -[/B] 4. Six sahuagin coral smashers (hard) [B]- short rest -[/B] 5. A Kraken priest (BBEG) and five sahuagin coral smashers (deadly) [B]- long rest -[/B] Using the above point system: 2+3+3 (rest) +3 (rest) +4 (long rest) = 15. Not guite the 17.5, but close. We could have handled another moderate encounter probably at most without [I]serious[/I] risk of TPK... [B]Session 2:[/B] [I]the players decided to remove the remaining threats to the area[/I] 1. Four merrows (hard) 2. Four swarms of quippers (easy, avoided) 3. A water elemental and a sahuagin (hard) [B]- short rest -[/B] 4. Four hunter sharks (hard) 5. Two sahuagin priestesses (moderate) x. Two merfolk (allied - no point cost) 6a. Two sahuagins (easy) [B]Session 3:[/B] [I]battle resumed after the two sahuagins when their companions came[/I] 6b. Four sahuagins and two sea hags -- the merfolk we allied with (hard, resulted in PC death) [B]- short rest -[/B] (we didn't have time for another long rest but we REALLY wanted it) 7. Six sahuagin coral smashers (hard), this used a lot of our last ditch resources like [I]relentless endurance[/I] on BOTH half-orc PCs... The PCs were nearly exhausted of all resources. Now, losing the healer in the prior encounter really made this one hurt. x. Ten merfolk and four reef sharks (allied - no point cost) STORY AWARD: finally closed portal [B]- long rest -[/B] (on the surface) 3+1+3 (rest) +3+2+1+3 (rest) + 3 (long rest) = 19. A bit over the 17.5, and we felt it at the 16 point mark! Between the two "adventuring days" for sessions 1-3 above, the total is 34 points, just one shy of the 35 average. Now, the PCs could have gone in different directions changing the encounter order, and they would have had to adjust the rest schedule to match it--wondering if the next encounter might be too much to handle with their current resources levels. The "sahuagin lair" was designed around the world implications for the cave system map, random rolls for encounter difficulty (based on the WOLRD, not the PCs!!!, but this is another point not directly connected to the guidelines in the DMG...), and a search to find creatures appropriate to the encounter difficulty, story, etc. In the long run, IME, it tends to work itself out. EDIT: I just realized a point system of 1- easy 2- moderate 4- hard 8- deadly at 6-8 moderate/hard encounters would generate 21 points on average. So, one hard and two deadly encounters--which likely might require a short rest after each, would give you the attrition needed for an adventuring day most likely. I prefer to spread it out a bit more, but it might work... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do players really want balance?
Top