Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do the initiative rules discourage parley?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 2196814" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>This is the opposite problem of thinking that whoever acts first gets a surprise round. </p><p></p><p>First, you can essentially 'take 20' on initiative provided you get a round to prepare. Unfortunately, this is a problem because the thieves can after a round do the same thing, which would favor the thieves I admit.</p><p></p><p>But, thieves lying on the ground need a move equivalent action to standup, and another move equivalent action to draw or pickup a weapon. So unless you are dealing with high level thieves with quickdraw and amazing tumble skills, the players would still get a full round of attacks on the thieves before they could do anything - and a full two rounds if the players win initiative.</p><p></p><p>Second, even if the thieves win initiative (as I pointed out above) they won't catch the party flat footed. </p><p></p><p>Thirdly, why doesn't someone in the party have the initimidate skill and intimidate these thieves into timidity? I would suggest that this is an example of something that would give a pretty high circumstance bonus to your initimidate checks.</p><p></p><p>Fourthly, if a player expressed a concern to me that this wasn't enough and/or the player seemed particularly careful to watch for any sign of hostile intent, I'd allow the players to make a sense motive check vs. the thieves bluff skill <em>to detect the attempt of a thief he was covering to ready his combat action</em> and give that player oppurtunity to respond using his readied action 'take 20' initiative before the thief can 'take 20' himself, thereby forcing the thief to beat the players initiative bonus + 20 - which would be hard for almost anyone improved initiative or not. For the record, I thought that the rules on this where alot clearer back in 3.0 when the Refocus action was specifically spelled out rather than made an aspect of the Ready action as in 3.5.</p><p></p><p>Fifthly, how did the thieves signal to each other that this was the time to go. Surely if they hadn't passed some gestures covertly to each other, one thief jumping up and attacking would catch the other thieves as much by surprise as it would the party.</p><p></p><p>And sixthly, whatever you think is a fair way to handle this, understand that the same is true for the party of thieves catching the player's unaware and sleeping. If the player's want some advantage, remind them that that same advantage can be used against them.</p><p></p><p>Lastly, and somewhat off topic, I don't think that D&D's initiative system is really all that unrealistic for having such a large random factor. Real life, things happen really quickly, and even people with agile reflexes can be caught blinking. Think of the times that NFL players catch each other off completely gaurd even after dozens of times facing each other in the same game and even though all of them are well honed atheletes and aware that the action is about to begin. Keep all this in mind the next time you are watching real combat footage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 2196814, member: 4937"] This is the opposite problem of thinking that whoever acts first gets a surprise round. First, you can essentially 'take 20' on initiative provided you get a round to prepare. Unfortunately, this is a problem because the thieves can after a round do the same thing, which would favor the thieves I admit. But, thieves lying on the ground need a move equivalent action to standup, and another move equivalent action to draw or pickup a weapon. So unless you are dealing with high level thieves with quickdraw and amazing tumble skills, the players would still get a full round of attacks on the thieves before they could do anything - and a full two rounds if the players win initiative. Second, even if the thieves win initiative (as I pointed out above) they won't catch the party flat footed. Thirdly, why doesn't someone in the party have the initimidate skill and intimidate these thieves into timidity? I would suggest that this is an example of something that would give a pretty high circumstance bonus to your initimidate checks. Fourthly, if a player expressed a concern to me that this wasn't enough and/or the player seemed particularly careful to watch for any sign of hostile intent, I'd allow the players to make a sense motive check vs. the thieves bluff skill [i]to detect the attempt of a thief he was covering to ready his combat action[/i] and give that player oppurtunity to respond using his readied action 'take 20' initiative before the thief can 'take 20' himself, thereby forcing the thief to beat the players initiative bonus + 20 - which would be hard for almost anyone improved initiative or not. For the record, I thought that the rules on this where alot clearer back in 3.0 when the Refocus action was specifically spelled out rather than made an aspect of the Ready action as in 3.5. Fifthly, how did the thieves signal to each other that this was the time to go. Surely if they hadn't passed some gestures covertly to each other, one thief jumping up and attacking would catch the other thieves as much by surprise as it would the party. And sixthly, whatever you think is a fair way to handle this, understand that the same is true for the party of thieves catching the player's unaware and sleeping. If the player's want some advantage, remind them that that same advantage can be used against them. Lastly, and somewhat off topic, I don't think that D&D's initiative system is really all that unrealistic for having such a large random factor. Real life, things happen really quickly, and even people with agile reflexes can be caught blinking. Think of the times that NFL players catch each other off completely gaurd even after dozens of times facing each other in the same game and even though all of them are well honed atheletes and aware that the action is about to begin. Keep all this in mind the next time you are watching real combat footage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do the initiative rules discourage parley?
Top