Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do the PCs ever die in these playtest reports?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 4032351" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Personally, I think its because you are dealing with (for the most part) highly experienced players.</p><p></p><p>I know from my experience that there was a big difference in the amount of challenge my friends could handle as players, and the amount of challenge that random kids could handle on an open table night at the gaming store. There is a certain amount of skill involved.</p><p></p><p>If the party doesn't lose cohesion, if the players don't become confused or paniced, and if the players make the best use of the resources that they have available, no deaths is the expected result for a game in the 'sweet spot' of any edition. We know they've taken some steps to up the power level of low level characters. We know that they've taken out 'save or die'. So with an experienced play group, I think you can expect no deaths to occur.</p><p></p><p>Two takes on that, one positive and one negative.</p><p></p><p>First, it says something good about the system that DM's without alot of experience with the system can present balanced challenges quite easily. We know that they are balanced challenges because we aren't hearing about a lot of player deaths, and even those skeptical about the new system (like me) have to admit that the early reports on how engrossing combat is are very positive.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, given how much they've 'nerfed' the danger of the game by removing dangerous conditions and attacks from the game, and the change in the relative ratio of damage per round to hit points (something incidently I largely approve of), the move away from 'operational' resource management toward purely tactical challenges, as a DM I'm wondering how you'd actually seriously threaten an experienced party. It doesn't seem like there is much that can go wrong for a player provided that the team doesn't make really dumb mistakes. This was actually a bit of a problem in 1st edition, in as much as the only way to really threaten a high level 1st edition party with experienced players (and by high level, I mean 'above 10th') was to spam them with random 'save or die' attacks and wait for random failure. Otherwise, the players tended to mow over ordinary challenges because the rules were all heavily weighted in thier favor by that point. Third editions removal of the rules separation between PC and NPC (among other things) tended to mitagate that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 4032351, member: 4937"] Personally, I think its because you are dealing with (for the most part) highly experienced players. I know from my experience that there was a big difference in the amount of challenge my friends could handle as players, and the amount of challenge that random kids could handle on an open table night at the gaming store. There is a certain amount of skill involved. If the party doesn't lose cohesion, if the players don't become confused or paniced, and if the players make the best use of the resources that they have available, no deaths is the expected result for a game in the 'sweet spot' of any edition. We know they've taken some steps to up the power level of low level characters. We know that they've taken out 'save or die'. So with an experienced play group, I think you can expect no deaths to occur. Two takes on that, one positive and one negative. First, it says something good about the system that DM's without alot of experience with the system can present balanced challenges quite easily. We know that they are balanced challenges because we aren't hearing about a lot of player deaths, and even those skeptical about the new system (like me) have to admit that the early reports on how engrossing combat is are very positive. On the other hand, given how much they've 'nerfed' the danger of the game by removing dangerous conditions and attacks from the game, and the change in the relative ratio of damage per round to hit points (something incidently I largely approve of), the move away from 'operational' resource management toward purely tactical challenges, as a DM I'm wondering how you'd actually seriously threaten an experienced party. It doesn't seem like there is much that can go wrong for a player provided that the team doesn't make really dumb mistakes. This was actually a bit of a problem in 1st edition, in as much as the only way to really threaten a high level 1st edition party with experienced players (and by high level, I mean 'above 10th') was to spam them with random 'save or die' attacks and wait for random failure. Otherwise, the players tended to mow over ordinary challenges because the rules were all heavily weighted in thier favor by that point. Third editions removal of the rules separation between PC and NPC (among other things) tended to mitagate that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Do the PCs ever die in these playtest reports?
Top