Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HighTemplar" data-source="post: 4519459" data-attributes="member: 77594">This is exactly how it worked before the errata, now it dosen't work like that anymore. as per:   And Sorry OP I did miss your point. I though you were asking if vulnerabilities stacked.  For additionnal vulnerabilities, like vulnerable all, or vulnerable to your attacks, I don't think they were meant to stack, but then again in my game, a Vampire that got hit by strand of fate hit by a radiant attack did get +27 dmg, so I guess it comes down to your judgement until someone quotes the correct line ^^. If what you werre asking was: If I give a creature (that has vulnerable fire 5), vulnerable lightning 5, and I attack him with a power that does 10 fire AND lightning damage, how much damage does the monster take. Mathematically, it makes no sense to stack vulnerabilities.Let me demonstrate(lol). You hit the said(vul 5 fire and vul 5 lightning) monster with a PBnJ sandwich. Considering your PBnJ sandwhich is as big as a solely Peanut butter sandwhich, or a solely Jelly sandwhich, (10lightning dmg is as much damage as 10 fire dmg or 10 fire AND lightning dmg) Then, everything thats not peanut butter in your sandwhich is actually jelly, and the monster is equally vulnerable to those substance so it does not matter what proportion of jelly you got. the monster is just allergic to that substance whaveter the substance. If the monster was vul 10 fire and vul 5 lightning, Then I guess it makes sense to use only it's biggest vulnerability. Although I guess the average would make more sense, it will never be applicable in dnd4e.</blockquote>

Verification