Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Archangel_Zer0" data-source="post: 4065114" data-attributes="member: 51662">If we don't need a bard then....We don't need a rogue either - just a fighter with a high intelligence and dexterity who specializes in a lot of skills.Oh, we don't need a monk either, just a fighter who specializes in using his body as a weapon (or staffs, kama's blah blah blah)We wouldn't need Wizards or Clerics, and therefore no distinguishing between Arcane and Divine magic... you can see the logical progression of where this is going right?Yes we need the Bard class, just like we need the other classes.&nbsp; Why?&nbsp; To give options and diversity to the game.&nbsp; The more options with specialized gifts/abilities creates a more pleasurable plethora of choices so more people can have more diverse characters, instead of 2 different characters that specialize in different modes of their basic category.But I suppose that include the desire for diversity.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Archangel_Zer0, post: 4065114, member: 51662"] [b]If we don't need a bard then....[/b] We don't need a rogue either - just a fighter with a high intelligence and dexterity who specializes in a lot of skills. Oh, we don't need a monk either, just a fighter who specializes in using his body as a weapon (or staffs, kama's blah blah blah) We wouldn't need Wizards or Clerics, and therefore no distinguishing between Arcane and Divine magic... you can see the logical progression of where this is going right? Yes we need the Bard class, just like we need the other classes. Why? To give options and diversity to the game. The more options with specialized gifts/abilities creates a more pleasurable plethora of choices so more people can have more diverse characters, instead of 2 different characters that specialize in different modes of their basic category. But I suppose that include the desire for diversity. [/QUOTE]

Verification