Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do We Really Need Multiclassing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9043166" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>That's within the ballpark, yes.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps, to help the explanation, it would be good to note that I would prefer that Paladins, Rangers, Psions (or whatever we call them), and (possibly) Shaman <strong><em>not</em></strong> cast spells. That doesn't mean they shouldn't have <em>supernatural abilities,</em> mind. Just that their supernatural power should not be the narrow, highly specific thematic-mechanical structure that is "spellcasting." So I would likewise want Swordmages to definitely use magic (it's right there in the name, "mage"!) but NOT <em>cast spells</em> in the sense of having a set of slots, preparations, etc., etc., instead having something like magical maneuvers that are skill and supernatural combined.</p><p></p><p>I should also clarify, I would not want the Swordmage to be incapable of bringing non-combat utility. I would just want that utility to be rooted in the same source as their skillful utility. E.g., perhaps an intermediate (e.g. level 5-9?) combat technique could be "Ethereal Lunge," allowing the Swordmage to leap through solid obstacles to attack an opponent on the other side. Outside of combat, one could use this as a limited form of teleportation, with the distance you can teleport defined by your movement speed or some multiple of your Acrobatics bonus (whichever is higher), and the number of people you can pull along with you defined by (say) half of your total Athletics skill bonus.* (A supernatural effect, yes, but it requires <em>physical</em> skill to use effectively.) By making these things techniques and not spells, they cannot be poached by other classes (similar to Channel Divinity), and they don't have to do a bunch of convoluted design to make them play nice with other spellcasting options.</p><p></p><p>*This is pure spitballing and would require plenty of testing. Please don't let "actually that specific design is horrible flaming rotten garbage" criticisms bleed into the more fundamental point of a class that requires both supernatural power and physical/material/mundane skill to be effective.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9043166, member: 6790260"] That's within the ballpark, yes. Perhaps, to help the explanation, it would be good to note that I would prefer that Paladins, Rangers, Psions (or whatever we call them), and (possibly) Shaman [B][I]not[/I][/B] cast spells. That doesn't mean they shouldn't have [I]supernatural abilities,[/I] mind. Just that their supernatural power should not be the narrow, highly specific thematic-mechanical structure that is "spellcasting." So I would likewise want Swordmages to definitely use magic (it's right there in the name, "mage"!) but NOT [I]cast spells[/I] in the sense of having a set of slots, preparations, etc., etc., instead having something like magical maneuvers that are skill and supernatural combined. I should also clarify, I would not want the Swordmage to be incapable of bringing non-combat utility. I would just want that utility to be rooted in the same source as their skillful utility. E.g., perhaps an intermediate (e.g. level 5-9?) combat technique could be "Ethereal Lunge," allowing the Swordmage to leap through solid obstacles to attack an opponent on the other side. Outside of combat, one could use this as a limited form of teleportation, with the distance you can teleport defined by your movement speed or some multiple of your Acrobatics bonus (whichever is higher), and the number of people you can pull along with you defined by (say) half of your total Athletics skill bonus.* (A supernatural effect, yes, but it requires [I]physical[/I] skill to use effectively.) By making these things techniques and not spells, they cannot be poached by other classes (similar to Channel Divinity), and they don't have to do a bunch of convoluted design to make them play nice with other spellcasting options. *This is pure spitballing and would require plenty of testing. Please don't let "actually that specific design is horrible flaming rotten garbage" criticisms bleed into the more fundamental point of a class that requires both supernatural power and physical/material/mundane skill to be effective. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do We Really Need Multiclassing?
Top