Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 5255074" data-attributes="member: 18280">Apology accepted.As for the conjecture, my point is that it is conjecture, which you seem to be taking for fact.&nbsp; I have no interest in proving you &quot;wrong&quot;; I am not at all certain that I believe you are wrong.You are allowed to accept whatever evidence you want, or set the bar of your skepticism as high or as low as you like.&nbsp; I fully support your right to do so.&nbsp; Moreover, I would agree that it is rational to do so.At the same time, though, it might be of use to you to realize that others might be more skeptical that Gen Con or EN World accurately represent how many people are playing 4e or 1e or any given e.And that is an equally reasonable position to hold.Because, the reality is that there is no real evidence on either side.&nbsp; We are, at best, taking stabs in the dark.RC</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 5255074, member: 18280"] Apology accepted. As for the conjecture, my point is that it is conjecture, which you seem to be taking for fact. I have no interest in proving you "wrong"; I am not at all certain that I believe you are wrong. You are allowed to accept whatever evidence you want, or set the bar of your skepticism as high or as low as you like. I fully support your right to do so. Moreover, I would agree that it is rational to do so. At the same time, though, it might be of use to you to realize that others might be more skeptical that Gen Con or EN World accurately represent how many people are playing 4e or 1e or any given e. And that is an equally reasonable position to hold. Because, the reality is that there is no real evidence on either side. We are, at best, taking stabs in the dark. RC [/QUOTE]

Verification