Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lonely Tylenol" data-source="post: 3319304" data-attributes="member: 18549">I just wonder why we never see proper errata when the FAQ gets updated monthly.  Really, all they would need to do is set up an update schedule (once per 6-12 months would be sufficient), have a stickied thread on the WotC boards for errata suggestions for each book released in the past year, and have one guy sort through and identify errors based on the suggestions.  Then, run the proposed changes past R&D one Friday afternoon to catch potential problems, and Bob's your uncle.  I think people would be happier if errata were released regularly, even if "regularly" means "predictable but not often".I don't like the way that changes are made in newer supplements without corresponding errata added to the errata list, just because it means that there are two official versions of the rule, instead of one.  That causes problems, especially if you aren't aware that something has been changed.  I know I haven't gone through Spell Compendium to see what they altered, and there's no list anywhere for me to check.  I don't mind them changing things, but for the sake of keeping things consistent between the DM and various players, it would be nice to know that various people in a gaming group are all working from the same rules text.  Having to make surprise decisions on the fly in critical situations because of rules alterations is not something I want from a new product.  I do enough of that already.</blockquote>

Verification