Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do you agree with WotC selling errata?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 3321828" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>Well the compendiums books obviously aren't published just to incorporate errata, that is just an accidental benefit.</p><p></p><p>I do think that WotC is not doing a very good job with regards to errata, although it could be worst.</p><p></p><p>First, every books has a lot of mistakes (see any John Cooper's review to get a clear idea). I know that the game is complicated and therefore difficult to double-check, but many of us buy the books for the "crunch", we buy it because we don't want to make up the numbers ourselves, and if the numbers are wrong then it spoils a small part of the reasons for having the book.</p><p></p><p>The reason why mistakes are not corrected before printing the book, is that it costs. Personally I'd vastly prefer to pay 10-20% more each book to have 90% less errors, but I'm sure that if WotC does this way, it is because their marketing department knows that gamers prefer cheaper books quickly with mistakes.</p><p></p><p>OTOH I don't understand why errata would be too expensive to be included in second printings. Lots of gamers don't buy a book immediately but only a few months after, and I think each book probably gets 2-3 printing batches. I can't believe they cannot afford to include errata already in the second printing...</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, nowadays there is a fantastic tool which is the web: they don't even have to pay someone at WotC checking books, because they can use the free-of-charge feedback from thousands of gamers. I am sure that a couple of months after the release of a book, many of the book's mistakes (monsters stats for example) have been noticed by the fans themselves, and WotC just needs to collect them.</p><p></p><p>Overall I am a bit disappointed that books always have so many mistakes, but it's not that terrible because after all the game is playable even with mistakes.</p><p></p><p>What irritates me most instead is reading gamers attacking others who would like a better print quality: what are you afraid of? That WotC goes bankrupt if trying to improve their quality? That you get 2 books less per year?</p><p>If you buy a car and find it defective, don't you wish the car manufacturer to fix it for you (and those who buy it next)? Or do you enjoy keeping your defective car because it benefits the car company? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>RPG gamers are weird customers <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 3321828, member: 1465"] Well the compendiums books obviously aren't published just to incorporate errata, that is just an accidental benefit. I do think that WotC is not doing a very good job with regards to errata, although it could be worst. First, every books has a lot of mistakes (see any John Cooper's review to get a clear idea). I know that the game is complicated and therefore difficult to double-check, but many of us buy the books for the "crunch", we buy it because we don't want to make up the numbers ourselves, and if the numbers are wrong then it spoils a small part of the reasons for having the book. The reason why mistakes are not corrected before printing the book, is that it costs. Personally I'd vastly prefer to pay 10-20% more each book to have 90% less errors, but I'm sure that if WotC does this way, it is because their marketing department knows that gamers prefer cheaper books quickly with mistakes. OTOH I don't understand why errata would be too expensive to be included in second printings. Lots of gamers don't buy a book immediately but only a few months after, and I think each book probably gets 2-3 printing batches. I can't believe they cannot afford to include errata already in the second printing... Furthermore, nowadays there is a fantastic tool which is the web: they don't even have to pay someone at WotC checking books, because they can use the free-of-charge feedback from thousands of gamers. I am sure that a couple of months after the release of a book, many of the book's mistakes (monsters stats for example) have been noticed by the fans themselves, and WotC just needs to collect them. Overall I am a bit disappointed that books always have so many mistakes, but it's not that terrible because after all the game is playable even with mistakes. What irritates me most instead is reading gamers attacking others who would like a better print quality: what are you afraid of? That WotC goes bankrupt if trying to improve their quality? That you get 2 books less per year? If you buy a car and find it defective, don't you wish the car manufacturer to fix it for you (and those who buy it next)? Or do you enjoy keeping your defective car because it benefits the car company? :D RPG gamers are weird customers :p [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do you agree with WotC selling errata?
Top