Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do you agree with WotC selling errata?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 3322278" data-attributes="member: 35788"><p>Actually, I do not believe you have been paying for the rules. Those are actually free in the d20 SRD OGL agreement. When you purchase the book, you get the book. If all you are buying is the rules ... then buying the PHB/DMG/XPH/MM1 then that was a collosal blunder. You can get the majority of it for free on the internet and download it!</p><p></p><p>Now that we've traded exaggerations to each other's points and not really done anything profitable, I'd like to talk a little sense.</p><p></p><p>WotC will not publish a book of giberish because it wouldn't sell. However, it is certainly within their rights to do so. And if you were to buy said book, you would have little right to complain because WotC books do not come hermetically sealed. You can proofread them. I would have absolutely no sympathy for a person who would buy a book of WotC gibberish and complain about it. People normally don't walk into a car dealership and buy a car without doing research, looking at Consumer Reports, or at the very least taking it out for a test drive!</p><p></p><p>My point is that arguing the extreme of a book of gibberish doesn't do anything. WotC publishes books that are flawed, but not gibberish. You as the consumer have the responsibility of deciding if you desire to consume. Either spend your money or don't. But purchasing a book you don't have to buy and complaining about content does not bering me to a point of sympathy. Consumers need to make sure that they are spending money appropriately. Anything else just encourages poor quality control.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't buy this either. I buy supplimetns and don't use them carte blanche. Many I do allow, but some of the things I don't. I have the ability to chose what sources I allow. Personally, I did not buy CPsi because I don't like most of what they did. (Especially with reagrd to the classes, not necessarily the power tweaks). I did not buy CS because I didn't like the variant rules regarding skill tricks and the like. But that's my choice. I don't have to buy it because they altered the rules.</p><p></p><p>As far as making sure there is a baseline in the rules, I agree. And in my opinion they have done that. Actually, they have not only done it, buy they exceded my expectations by making it available for free in the SRD, which is also under the Open Gaming License.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Good! I think this is the way that it should work! If more people didn't buy the books that they are complaining about, then a better message would be sent to WotC!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that is exactly what I am saying. Legally, WotC can print whatever they want in the book - especially because it isn't sealed content! They can print gibberish (and in my opinion did in the Races of series). So I didn't buy them. In my estimation, they are not obligated to print anything that is useful to me. But if they want my dollar, they will print stuff that is useful to me.</p><p></p><p>Their obligation is to make sure the product function (opens/closes, pages are in order with no missing pages). That is it. That is all they are obligated to do.</p><p></p><p>I am not obligated to buy the book. If I choose to buy the book, by the nature of the fact that the books are not sealed and I can preview the material before I purchase it then I am also giving my approval of the content in the act of purchasing.</p><p></p><p>Having said that, I think it is pretty darn nice of WotC to offer free errata on the web.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nonlethal Force, post: 3322278, member: 35788"] Actually, I do not believe you have been paying for the rules. Those are actually free in the d20 SRD OGL agreement. When you purchase the book, you get the book. If all you are buying is the rules ... then buying the PHB/DMG/XPH/MM1 then that was a collosal blunder. You can get the majority of it for free on the internet and download it! Now that we've traded exaggerations to each other's points and not really done anything profitable, I'd like to talk a little sense. WotC will not publish a book of giberish because it wouldn't sell. However, it is certainly within their rights to do so. And if you were to buy said book, you would have little right to complain because WotC books do not come hermetically sealed. You can proofread them. I would have absolutely no sympathy for a person who would buy a book of WotC gibberish and complain about it. People normally don't walk into a car dealership and buy a car without doing research, looking at Consumer Reports, or at the very least taking it out for a test drive! My point is that arguing the extreme of a book of gibberish doesn't do anything. WotC publishes books that are flawed, but not gibberish. You as the consumer have the responsibility of deciding if you desire to consume. Either spend your money or don't. But purchasing a book you don't have to buy and complaining about content does not bering me to a point of sympathy. Consumers need to make sure that they are spending money appropriately. Anything else just encourages poor quality control. I don't buy this either. I buy supplimetns and don't use them carte blanche. Many I do allow, but some of the things I don't. I have the ability to chose what sources I allow. Personally, I did not buy CPsi because I don't like most of what they did. (Especially with reagrd to the classes, not necessarily the power tweaks). I did not buy CS because I didn't like the variant rules regarding skill tricks and the like. But that's my choice. I don't have to buy it because they altered the rules. As far as making sure there is a baseline in the rules, I agree. And in my opinion they have done that. Actually, they have not only done it, buy they exceded my expectations by making it available for free in the SRD, which is also under the Open Gaming License. Good! I think this is the way that it should work! If more people didn't buy the books that they are complaining about, then a better message would be sent to WotC! I think that is exactly what I am saying. Legally, WotC can print whatever they want in the book - especially because it isn't sealed content! They can print gibberish (and in my opinion did in the Races of series). So I didn't buy them. In my estimation, they are not obligated to print anything that is useful to me. But if they want my dollar, they will print stuff that is useful to me. Their obligation is to make sure the product function (opens/closes, pages are in order with no missing pages). That is it. That is all they are obligated to do. I am not obligated to buy the book. If I choose to buy the book, by the nature of the fact that the books are not sealed and I can preview the material before I purchase it then I am also giving my approval of the content in the act of purchasing. Having said that, I think it is pretty darn nice of WotC to offer free errata on the web. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do you agree with WotC selling errata?
Top