Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do You Allow Evil PCs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 1912045" data-attributes="member: 16285"><p>I voted yes, but it depends. . . </p><p></p><p>In 2nd ed I allowed an evil PC into a redominately good party. While the player who actually played the evil PC did an excellent job of not disrupting the party, the remainder of the group ended up playing witch-hunt (too much meta-gaming me thinks) and the party was so torn apart (even though none of them knew which PC was evil, in fact they were pinning it on a different PC whose player was playing extremely chaotic, but not evil, that I had to make two parties and run two separate groups/games within the same campaign. Far too mucheffort and caused a total breakdown in continuity.</p><p></p><p>Now in 3/3.5 things are much different. While 2nd ed promoted individual play (exp awards based on individual PC actions - which were often in conflict with the other PCs), 3/3.5 promotes teamwork. All exp awards (except for role-laying ones) are based on the team and split individually. This keeps the in-game backstabbing to a minimum (which far too often carries outside of the game, from my perspective). So if one player is running an evil PC and the rest are running good ones, things are fine as long as thePC work together. When they don't, well the entire party suffers but not gaining the exp they could have. A few sessions like that and the group learns quickly how to work together or they will not gain anything except the joy of "pissing" off the other PCs (and possibly the other players).</p><p></p><p>IMO it is important to lay the team concept of 3/3.5 out for the players before they create their characters and ensure they understand that unlike 2nd there are essentially no individual awards.</p><p></p><p>Personally I'm finding it harder and harder to define things in terms of good and evil within a game. Law and chaos are much easier, but good and evil tend to be a matter of the character's perspective. Maybe it's something I developed from playing Dark Sun (in 2nd ed) where good and evil was a kind of grey area - I guess that fits in with the Eberron way closer than others do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="irdeggman, post: 1912045, member: 16285"] I voted yes, but it depends. . . In 2nd ed I allowed an evil PC into a redominately good party. While the player who actually played the evil PC did an excellent job of not disrupting the party, the remainder of the group ended up playing witch-hunt (too much meta-gaming me thinks) and the party was so torn apart (even though none of them knew which PC was evil, in fact they were pinning it on a different PC whose player was playing extremely chaotic, but not evil, that I had to make two parties and run two separate groups/games within the same campaign. Far too mucheffort and caused a total breakdown in continuity. Now in 3/3.5 things are much different. While 2nd ed promoted individual play (exp awards based on individual PC actions - which were often in conflict with the other PCs), 3/3.5 promotes teamwork. All exp awards (except for role-laying ones) are based on the team and split individually. This keeps the in-game backstabbing to a minimum (which far too often carries outside of the game, from my perspective). So if one player is running an evil PC and the rest are running good ones, things are fine as long as thePC work together. When they don't, well the entire party suffers but not gaining the exp they could have. A few sessions like that and the group learns quickly how to work together or they will not gain anything except the joy of "pissing" off the other PCs (and possibly the other players). IMO it is important to lay the team concept of 3/3.5 out for the players before they create their characters and ensure they understand that unlike 2nd there are essentially no individual awards. Personally I'm finding it harder and harder to define things in terms of good and evil within a game. Law and chaos are much easier, but good and evil tend to be a matter of the character's perspective. Maybe it's something I developed from playing Dark Sun (in 2nd ed) where good and evil was a kind of grey area - I guess that fits in with the Eberron way closer than others do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do You Allow Evil PCs?
Top