Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7241433" data-attributes="member: 16814">Usually no, not because I have a problem with it, some of it quite good, but because of sourcing issues.  Selfishly, i don't want to have to get access to and then fully understand even more material than what I already have to with the official stuff.  It means I have to be expert at more things or take time to research corner cases in game when they come up.  I will occasionally make case-by-case exceptions, but, in general, i limit the amount of things I add to games (including UA stuff) because of the increase in my workload.I don't understand your distinction.  A lot of 3rd party stuff undergoes even less playtesting than the UA stuff -- they're essentially at the same level of development -- so why accept it from a 3rd party of potentially dubious rules understanding and not from the developers of the game?And, to be clear, this is trying to understand your position on this as I might be missing something, and not a criticism of your choice.  It's a fine choice, and you appear to be very happy with it.</blockquote>