Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do You Care About Planescape Lore?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6134072" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>Phew. This is yet another thread that got away from me. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>Look, my basic point is pretty much exactly what Aldarc said. I feel that setting specific canon belongs in that specific setting and should not bleed over into other settings. I would go a bit further and say that setting specific cannon should not be a consideration when talking about core elements. If changing something in core makes it more broadly appealing, then that change should be done. If it's wrong, then change it back. But, simply dismissing change because it doesn't conform to what came before is never the right thing. If an element cannot be justified on its own, then that element should be changed.</p><p></p><p>Maybe it's my own biases. I dunno. I just believe that Planescape fans have been very, very vocal about PS canon and how it must never be changed. Maybe it's just because of two or three planar monster articles recently from WOTC. I do know that I've had this discussion more than a few times over the years.</p><p></p><p>But, hey, the majority has spoken. Planescape lore is important. More than I would have though. Fair enough. I'll bow out now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6134072, member: 22779"] Phew. This is yet another thread that got away from me. :D Look, my basic point is pretty much exactly what Aldarc said. I feel that setting specific canon belongs in that specific setting and should not bleed over into other settings. I would go a bit further and say that setting specific cannon should not be a consideration when talking about core elements. If changing something in core makes it more broadly appealing, then that change should be done. If it's wrong, then change it back. But, simply dismissing change because it doesn't conform to what came before is never the right thing. If an element cannot be justified on its own, then that element should be changed. Maybe it's my own biases. I dunno. I just believe that Planescape fans have been very, very vocal about PS canon and how it must never be changed. Maybe it's just because of two or three planar monster articles recently from WOTC. I do know that I've had this discussion more than a few times over the years. But, hey, the majority has spoken. Planescape lore is important. More than I would have though. Fair enough. I'll bow out now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do You Care About Planescape Lore?
Top