Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you Consider Flavor Text to be part of Raw?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6423705" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>You know the game. You know the monsters and the tropes. So any changes you make are informed changes, based on the presentation of the monster as it's been (or as you've perceived it) over the years: you know both orcs and gnolls are the same alignment and thus feel comfortable swapping their religious inclinations. That's your choice. </p><p>But having the flavour allows you to make that choice. You could also choose that the flavour is just fine as it is. Perhaps gnolls just don't interest you, so you don't see the need to make any changes. The presence of the flavour makes things easier. Not having the flavour would make those races much more generic, much harder to tell apart. The flavour differentiates them as the low CR humanoid monsters. </p><p></p><p></p><p>But monsters are a complex example. </p><p>An easier one is something like, oh, <em>fireball</em>. The description in Basic says:</p><p></p><p></p><p>What's flavour and what's mechanics in that? One would argue that the only mechanics are: <em>Each creature in a 20-foot-radius sphere centered on that point must make a Dexterity saving throw. A target takes 8d6 fire damage on a failed save, or half as much damage on a successful one.</em> That'd be the part singled out for a Hit/Miss line in 4e, while the rest would like be in italics below the name. </p><p>But the rest of the flavour could still have a mechanical or game effect. The wizard points a finger and releases a streak of light that explodes. As I said earlier, what if someone tries to intercept? It also implies you need to be able to see the center of the explosion to aim. It also emphasises that you aim at a point, not an item. So you can detonate in mid-air. </p><p>There's also the description of the "low roar" that might call for Wisdom checks to hear the blast. </p><p>And, of course, the fire ignites things like flammable objects. If just going be "the rules" then it only affects creatures, as they're the ones called out to make saving throws. This came up a few times in 4e, when powers specified "creature" or "enemy" in the attack line, meaning they couldn't be used to, say, <strong>ignite</strong> a library or blast down a wooden door. Not according to RAW.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6423705, member: 37579"] You know the game. You know the monsters and the tropes. So any changes you make are informed changes, based on the presentation of the monster as it's been (or as you've perceived it) over the years: you know both orcs and gnolls are the same alignment and thus feel comfortable swapping their religious inclinations. That's your choice. But having the flavour allows you to make that choice. You could also choose that the flavour is just fine as it is. Perhaps gnolls just don't interest you, so you don't see the need to make any changes. The presence of the flavour makes things easier. Not having the flavour would make those races much more generic, much harder to tell apart. The flavour differentiates them as the low CR humanoid monsters. But monsters are a complex example. An easier one is something like, oh, [I]fireball[/I]. The description in Basic says: What's flavour and what's mechanics in that? One would argue that the only mechanics are: [I]Each creature in a 20-foot-radius sphere centered on that point must make a Dexterity saving throw. A target takes 8d6 fire damage on a failed save, or half as much damage on a successful one.[/I] That'd be the part singled out for a Hit/Miss line in 4e, while the rest would like be in italics below the name. But the rest of the flavour could still have a mechanical or game effect. The wizard points a finger and releases a streak of light that explodes. As I said earlier, what if someone tries to intercept? It also implies you need to be able to see the center of the explosion to aim. It also emphasises that you aim at a point, not an item. So you can detonate in mid-air. There's also the description of the "low roar" that might call for Wisdom checks to hear the blast. And, of course, the fire ignites things like flammable objects. If just going be "the rules" then it only affects creatures, as they're the ones called out to make saving throws. This came up a few times in 4e, when powers specified "creature" or "enemy" in the attack line, meaning they couldn't be used to, say, [B]ignite[/B] a library or blast down a wooden door. Not according to RAW. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you Consider Flavor Text to be part of Raw?
Top