Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do You Enjoy The Rogues New Role?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jack7" data-source="post: 4772031" data-attributes="member: 54707"><p><strong><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/254759-worlds-apart.html" target="_blank">In my setting</a></strong>, which is admittedly semi-historical/real world and therefore won't be for people who prefer more normal fantasy type settings, we've done away with "Classes" altogether and instead went with Professions, because let's face it, D&D classes are really at heart professions, not classes. (Although the game has over time changed the idea of what constitutes a class into something entirely game oriented in definition.) Professions are built around work skills and work function, not powers or special abilities, though people can have or obtain those things over time.</p><p></p><p>So, that being the case we've done away with the Rogue as a class as well. The Rogue is now a "general-type" of profession, as the "Combatant" is for Soldier, Paladin, Ranger, and so forth. For instance you have Religious types, and Combatant types, and Expert Types, and Rogue Types, and so forth.</p><p></p><p>Instead of the "class", professions such as (depending on how they are played) Agents, Scouts, and even Bards can be Rogues. How well they fight is up to them as to how well trained they want to become at fighting, versus the time they spend learning other abilities, like spying, stealth, languages. Anyone can élan thieving skills as well if they wish.</p><p></p><p>Then you have the Acers or Sharpers, people who have a wide range of trained professional abilities and can operate entirely alone if necessary (like a single agent Special Forces operative), though also in groups. And the Vadders, who are a special "sub-class" (really an avocational profession - anyone can become a Vadder no matter what your real profession) of operatives who can also operate alone, sort of like an Undercover Detective - to use a modern analogy. (The Acer and Vadder are like "overlays" when it comes to profession, or value-added capabilities for professional careers.) And finally the multi-classed which can often include Agents and Scouts in their professional training and career types.</p><p></p><p>Most Rogues can or do become good at spying and a lot become good at "old-fashioned" thieving skills, sneaking, climbing, opening locks, eavesdropping, stuff like that. Some become very good at ambush and sniping as well. It just depends on what they want to do and what their job usually demands out of them as to what they train for and become practiced and exercised at. (I was reading a really good book called <em><strong>Trigger Men</strong></em>, about modern snipers, and one sniper, a guy they called <em>Spider-Man</em> said that he thought climbing, sneaking, etc. were fundamental sniper skills. Because a sniper ought to be able to sneak right past a family in an urban apartment building while they are sleeping in order to get to the roof of a building and set up for their work positioning. I couldn't agree more with that assessment and I feel the same way about many Agents, Scouts, Bards, Rangers and Vigilantes, Sharpers, Vadders, and even some Barbarians. Whatever your job requires of you to get the job done that is what you should train for and practice often.)</p><p></p><p>And finally you have professions (as a loose definitional description) like Thieves (who usually operate alone or in loose and informal groups) and Bandits and Pirates (who usually operate in more or less fixed groups of criminals) often become good at ambush and killing, as well as stand-up man-to man fighting from time to time. But in our game thieves and bandits are usually NPCs and opposition to the characters. </p><p></p><p>In any case I like Rogues, but then again we don't play them as normally presented. They are much more versatile in my setting I think. And you can mix their abilities far more freely with the other professions in many cases. So that makes them fun and interesting.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I like that analogy.</p><p></p><p>Professions should be like that too. Yes, the profession of a Soldier, let's say, should come with certain components pre-packaged, but you should always be able to add more sub-components as the situation requires, and even be able to add-in components that are entirely personal and not strictly profession-related. Very person is a mixture of their professional and private/personal interests, and characters should be allowed to be that way as well. Else you don't really have a real character, you just have a character-type.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jack7, post: 4772031, member: 54707"] [B][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/254759-worlds-apart.html"]In my setting[/URL][/B], which is admittedly semi-historical/real world and therefore won't be for people who prefer more normal fantasy type settings, we've done away with "Classes" altogether and instead went with Professions, because let's face it, D&D classes are really at heart professions, not classes. (Although the game has over time changed the idea of what constitutes a class into something entirely game oriented in definition.) Professions are built around work skills and work function, not powers or special abilities, though people can have or obtain those things over time. So, that being the case we've done away with the Rogue as a class as well. The Rogue is now a "general-type" of profession, as the "Combatant" is for Soldier, Paladin, Ranger, and so forth. For instance you have Religious types, and Combatant types, and Expert Types, and Rogue Types, and so forth. Instead of the "class", professions such as (depending on how they are played) Agents, Scouts, and even Bards can be Rogues. How well they fight is up to them as to how well trained they want to become at fighting, versus the time they spend learning other abilities, like spying, stealth, languages. Anyone can élan thieving skills as well if they wish. Then you have the Acers or Sharpers, people who have a wide range of trained professional abilities and can operate entirely alone if necessary (like a single agent Special Forces operative), though also in groups. And the Vadders, who are a special "sub-class" (really an avocational profession - anyone can become a Vadder no matter what your real profession) of operatives who can also operate alone, sort of like an Undercover Detective - to use a modern analogy. (The Acer and Vadder are like "overlays" when it comes to profession, or value-added capabilities for professional careers.) And finally the multi-classed which can often include Agents and Scouts in their professional training and career types. Most Rogues can or do become good at spying and a lot become good at "old-fashioned" thieving skills, sneaking, climbing, opening locks, eavesdropping, stuff like that. Some become very good at ambush and sniping as well. It just depends on what they want to do and what their job usually demands out of them as to what they train for and become practiced and exercised at. (I was reading a really good book called [I][B]Trigger Men[/B][/I], about modern snipers, and one sniper, a guy they called [I]Spider-Man[/I] said that he thought climbing, sneaking, etc. were fundamental sniper skills. Because a sniper ought to be able to sneak right past a family in an urban apartment building while they are sleeping in order to get to the roof of a building and set up for their work positioning. I couldn't agree more with that assessment and I feel the same way about many Agents, Scouts, Bards, Rangers and Vigilantes, Sharpers, Vadders, and even some Barbarians. Whatever your job requires of you to get the job done that is what you should train for and practice often.) And finally you have professions (as a loose definitional description) like Thieves (who usually operate alone or in loose and informal groups) and Bandits and Pirates (who usually operate in more or less fixed groups of criminals) often become good at ambush and killing, as well as stand-up man-to man fighting from time to time. But in our game thieves and bandits are usually NPCs and opposition to the characters. In any case I like Rogues, but then again we don't play them as normally presented. They are much more versatile in my setting I think. And you can mix their abilities far more freely with the other professions in many cases. So that makes them fun and interesting. I like that analogy. Professions should be like that too. Yes, the profession of a Soldier, let's say, should come with certain components pre-packaged, but you should always be able to add more sub-components as the situation requires, and even be able to add-in components that are entirely personal and not strictly profession-related. Very person is a mixture of their professional and private/personal interests, and characters should be allowed to be that way as well. Else you don't really have a real character, you just have a character-type. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Do You Enjoy The Rogues New Role?
Top